Hallows?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Michael Gambon
maxxie_million — 16 years ago(August 04, 2009 12:52 PM)
Will he be in either Deathly Hallows films?
At all?
If not I will be quite saddened by the absence of Dumblydorr
Nothing ever ends.- Dr Manhattan
-
Angelkrista — 15 years ago(March 09, 2011 05:02 PM)
"They follow them quite closely, actually. All the major plot points are always there"
That statement is an insult to the books. Sorcerers Stone and Chamber of Secrets not withstanding (Thank you Chris Columbus and Harris)
Do or do not, there is no try - Yoda -
Cactusgod11 — 14 years ago(July 12, 2011 09:23 PM)
Chris Columbus is the series worst director? Harris is a frail, crappy old dumbledore? I'd laugh in your face if I was talking to you in person. Columbus followed the books THE BEST compared to any of the other directors and Harris portrayed Dumbledore to a T. The only way you'd think the way you do is if you did NOT read the books. If you DID read the booksread them again.
-
GrinReeper — 14 years ago(July 15, 2011 08:24 PM)
I'd laugh in your face in response, you stupid fanboy/girl. Gambon made Dumbledore far more interesting than Harris. Columbus copied everything from the books at the expense of propb68er character development, inspired direction, and originality. JK Rowling is good, but her writing fell apart in the last few books. God awful writing, god awful plotting. Yates & co improved on her lazy authorship.
INSIGHTFUL SAYINGS!
-
overwatch17 — 15 years ago(March 30, 2011 04:57 PM)
His appearance near the end is pretty important, it'll probably be in there. Oh and Angelkrista, calling the first book Sorcerors Stone is more insulting than any of the films (except maybe Half Blood Prince, that one sucked).
-
applescruff1987 — 15 years ago(April 03, 2011 01:55 PM)
@ Overwatch17 It's an INSULT to call it Sorcerer's Stone? What a stupid statement. Yes it's lame that they released it under that name, but since they did, it counts as a correct title.
Philosopher's Stone is a better title of course, but think about it : For the past 10 years or so, we have been reading that book and watching that film and seeing and hearing them say "Sorcerer's Stone" over and over again. You can't expect us to call it Philosopher's, can you? Please don't blame US readers/viewers for Scholastic's decision.
Back on topic, I agree that he'll probably be in the film. That scene is crucial, I don't know how they could cut it. -
overwatch17 — 15 years ago(April 03, 2011 08:24 PM)
You do realise it was a joke right? I was poking fun at the people who do actually think the American title is offensive, since forums where those sorts of opinions appear also seem to spend ages nitpicking at every plot change in every film and griping about it.