She was not born in 1969
-
professor_of_gamez — 18 years ago(August 02, 2007 12:28 AM)
I opened this thread because I just saw her in her second appearance on Eureka.
Based on THAT, I would have guessed 45-50. She definitely looks older than her ex-husband on the show (Jack Carter).
I don't know if it's the extra weight or what. Her face just looks somewhat older, I think.
Is also weird to see her with the "new" breast imp5b4lants. -
whenry-1 — 18 years ago(August 24, 2007 11:13 AM)
I got this from this web site: http://www.series-80.net/us/index.php?page=acteur&id=186&idat=186
BIOGRAPHY
Olivia d'Abo (born January 22, 1967 in London, UK) is an actress who starred on the television series The Wonder Years from 1988 to 1992. She also played C.I.A. agent Emma Wallace on an episode of Alias.
Either way she's still beautiful and we are more than happy to see her naked. Well i know i am
-
-
tresvies — 17 years ago(February 17, 2009 07:46 PM)
The information is in her Wikipedia page. It's a link from ancestry.com of British birth records. The link is still there.
I know Kung Fuand 50 other dangerous words. -
Catdubh — 16 years ago(May 29, 2009 01:59 PM)
Who cares! Most actresses take about 5 years off of the "actual" birthdate; it is a well known fact. I know a guy who was at Fairfax High School the same year Demi Moore was and had she graduated, they would have been in the same class. I saw his High School Year book, and therefore KNOW Demi was born in either 1959 or 1958, not in 1962, as she claims. (He was born in 1959.) Not a big deal. It has been working beautifully for Demi, for YEARS! Why can't it work for Olivia? She certainly looks like she can pass for someone born in 1969 or 1971.
Why do you care?
What, just for once in your life can't you be serious? -
gblove — 12 years ago(February 24, 2014 02:07 AM)
She certaib68nly looks like she can pass for someone born in 1969 or 1971.
Why do you care?
I suppose they care because many men found her sexually attractive (sometimes in the extreme) when they saw her in
Conan the Destroyer
and/or
Bolero
. Later, when they discovered how young she was during the filming of those motion pictures, they became uncomfortable with their attraction to such a young woman/girl. For these men, there is a huge difference between 1967, 1969, and 1971; the earliest date being the most preferable.
As far as I can discern, she was almost certainly 14 going on 15 when she was immortalized in
Conan the Destroyer
(I've never seen
Bolero
). I saw the film on television last night and I confess the following: As a man presently in his early 30's, I can't imagine finding any female on earth much (if any) more physically attractive than I find Olivia D'abo in that film. If that makes me "sick," I don't wish to be well. I view matters such as these from an anthropological viewpoint; and through that paradigm it is ridiculous and illogical to deny such an attraction. -
SleuthoundSeburo — 14 years ago(February 28, 2012 02:47 PM)
If she was born in 69 or 71 she looks super hot for her age.
Really hot. I saw her picture from a distance and thought she was some 20 yrs. old hottie. Damn she still looks good.
"I know I've been successfully assasinated!" -
NotMoreMovies — 11 years ago(July 05, 2014 01:16 AM)
Hmmm, I don't know what's been confirmed? But I'd be more willing to believe it was 1967 NOT 69.
That way she'd be 16/17 during Conan the Destroyer and not 14/15. But anything's possible. Either way, no wonder Arnold didn't kiss her back.I always wondered why he didn't, I thought she was at least 18. -