Slight athletic figure?
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kristy Swanson
HarveyManfredSinJohn — 10 years ago(October 28, 2015 05:19 PM)
Seriously?!?
When has the lovely Ms Swanson ever been 'slight' and who changed her trivia information from the earlier description where she was more accurately described as voluptuous?
Ms Swanson is lovely precisely because she was never a skinny slight type but actually looked healthy. Many critics have observed that she has a much more robust physique than later Buffy, Sarah Michelle Gellar. And it is also true that Ms Swanson struggled with her weight for a while and was admirably candid about her weigh2000t problems.
Ms Swanson is not fat, as some nasty posters on forums have suggested (although she was overweight for a while following pregnancy) but it would be utterly absurd to go the other extreme and pretend she was 'slight' or skinny, which she patently, and thankfully, never was. -
Box_Office_Now — 10 years ago(January 01, 2016 08:12 PM)
I agree. So much better than some of these actresses that are skinny as a pole.
http://www.whedon.info/IMG/jpg/kristy-swanson-2009-night-of-100-stars-gala-hq-03.jpg
http://ilarge.lisimg.com/image/2413429/760full-kristy-swanson.jpg -
timeslord — 10 years ago(January 22, 2016 04:01 AM)
She was really skinny in the late 90s, around 1995-1997, and it did not look good, thankfully by the time she was cast in early edition she looked her normal shape with a few more pounds on. Watch Meeting Daddy or Lover Girl, she was below her usual weight.
-
rwagner871 — 9 years ago(December 12, 2016 10:51 PM)
Totally agree. Listening to this fan boy crap is ridiculous. So for those who are visually impaired: now well into her 40's she is still beautiful. She has always had a great body and still does: with the curves exactly where any normal guy would like them to be on a woman. I'm sure there are many women who see her and gnash their teeth in jealously. She has aged extremely well. And her husband is a lucky guy.
