Shinning sequel
-
zill_o_the_wisp — 13 years ago(August 14, 2012 11:54 PM)
They're too good for Stephen King stuff. They need to do more original screenwriting these days, not less. And if they do keep adapting novels, they ought to pick things that haven't been done to death already.
-
jack181078 — 11 years ago(April 24, 2014 06:50 PM)
They're too good for Stephen King stuff.
Well adapted King has been the basis of films by Stanley KubrickThe ShiningBrian De PalmaCarrieJohn CarpenterChristine..and David CronenbergThe Dead Zone. The Coens would be in good company. -
Christopher_Smilax — 12 years ago(May 09, 2013 03:44 AM)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doctor_Sleep_(novel)
You mean Norman Bates Jr. is the baby daddy? -
mtppatrick — 12 years ago(May 10, 2013 05:46 PM)
Um, uh, yeah, it had everything to do with your conversation.
With Doctor Sleep, Stephen King returns to the characters and territory of one of his previous novels, The Shining. The novel features the now middle-aged Dan Torrance (the boy protagonist of The Shining) and the twelve-year-old girl, Abra Stone, that he must save from The True Knot. The True Knot are a group of almost immortal travelers who cross the country feeding off of children with the gift of "the shining." Dan drifted for decades in an attempt to escape his father's legacy, but eventually settled in a New Hampshire town and works in a nursing home, where his remnant mental abilities provide comfort to the dying. With the aid of a cat that can foresee the future, Dan becomes "Doctor Sleep." After meeting Abra Stone, an epic war between good and evil ensues.
Even broccoli screams when you pull it out of the ground -
billwenham — 12 years ago(May 10, 2013 06:02 PM)
Dude, I know all of this. You jumped in the middle of a conversation that jumped from another board with the same poster I was responding to, who was trolling the Star Wars board saying they were in a coma for sixteen years. But thanks for telling me beep I already knew about Doctor Sleep.
-
Slaterson14 — 10 years ago(February 01, 2016 01:25 PM)
I think the Shining is one film that should be left alone, no one would be able to top the Stanley Kubrick version its just too good for any of the hack directors living today IMO. Stephen King bashed the hell out of it because he was jealous that someone made his story better then he produced his own version and we all know how that turned out, he'd never admit it but I bet he was embarrassed by how his "proper version" turned out because it was not only a bad adaptation it was honestly one of the worst films of any genre Ive ever seen.
-
guccipix — 10 years ago(March 20, 2016 06:58 PM)
What the fck is the shinning
http://letterboxd.com/guccipix/list/my-top-100-favorite-films/ -
Robbmonster — 9 years ago(July 24, 2016 09:39 AM)
It's a skit from one of The Simpson's Halloween specials.
Never defend crap with 'It's just a movie'
http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds -
nicksaviking44 — 9 years ago(October 03, 2016 11:46 AM)
Most Stephen King based films turn out poorly because King uses a lot of inner monologue. This leaves bad filmmakers up to their own devices to tell the audience what is driving the plot and the motivations. It often turns out ugly and forced.
The Coens would have had the same issue with No Country for Old Men, which Cormic McCarthy also left with little external dialogue and lots of actions that needed to be interpreted by the audience. They did a fantastic job with that and could easily apply the same techniques to a King story.