Yikes. Did she or didn't she? :#
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sandra Bullock
kmj1230 — 10 years ago(August 01, 2015 07:02 AM)
F with her face?? Just w/in the last few years she's getting more/more Michael Jackson looking! When she won the Oscar just 5 years ago and even up until 2013-ish w/ The Heat and Gravity appeared she was aging gracefully. She still 'basically' had her classic, normal face. You could def. see some natural aging but still looked attractive and in most lighting and shots, as hot as ever esp her body! Seeing these very recent picshmmm she's looking 'botched' (aka bad surgery) and just not looking healthy. A little too skinny and emaciated. While I'm thrilled she's at the top of her game and turned a mixed/poorly reviewed movie into her biggest yet (will prob. top 300 million in the US alone)! she just doesn't look happy (esp. on the inside) and I think it resonates on the outside. That could be why she's getting more/more nips and tucks. Think about it..the ONLY meaningful connection or relationship was w/ that skunk where she pssed away 5 years of her life! For a woman so 'likable' and successful really does make you wonder about some of the recent rumors that she's not at all like her on screen persona. Obviously, she's an actress and many, many Hollywood stars are 200% different in real life than they 'appear' on TV, movies etcIt's just Sandra is and has always been SO likable in a totally anti Julia Roberts way where the pretentious and btchyness reeks through her pores. I know, I know we all have our bad days but I hope Sandra (for the most part) isn't a monster like Julia, Jlo etc.and most importantly finds *personal happiness!
-
BHt88 — 9 years ago(October 12, 2016 07:22 PM)
her face/skin was much darker before
(speed/speed 2/ demolition man)
BHT RISES myspace.com/blackheart60