Am I alone? Do we really need all these?
-
glassjhu14 — 11 years ago(April 22, 2014 07:37 PM)
I disagree. I think most people have a good understanding that the superhero movies that have been coming out over the last decade can be classified as a "superhero" genre. I think most people would term superhero movies as any movie that claims a character that started out in the comic universe, whether as a main character or as a side character. If we accept this as our definition, then we of course can't count Elsa as a part of the superhero genre.
-
-
glassjhu14 — 11 years ago(April 22, 2014 08:26 PM)
I'd say genres are pretty flexible to begin with though. I mean, if you look at some of the classic westerns and then compare them to Cowboys and Aliens, can you really say that they're all part of the same genre? I'm not even sure how much genres actually help us in appreciating films.
-
zeptron — 4 years ago(January 15, 2022 08:25 AM)
I know this thread was from a decade ago, but I want to say that at this point we may as well consider pretty much any action movie nowadays superhero films even if it doesn't have any superheroes in it since most of the main characters tend to behave and do the same stuff that superheroes do. If a "superhero movie" is about a guy who have super powers, you can make an argument that Fast and Furious movies are superhero movies too with the feats pulled off in those movies. The latest one had even more over the top stuff than the last few films. Hell, even John Wick is like a superhero at times. Even Mission Impossible could be considered an unofficial superhero movie, given how superhuman Ethan Hunt seems to be.