then Batman would have killed Superman?
-
CichlidAsh — 9 years ago(December 28, 2016 08:02 PM)
Yes the random chance of not only them having the same mothers name saved Supermans life but also it would seem that Batman forgot he was meant to have detective skills as well.
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock -
Fluffis — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 06:38 AM)
Except for how that didn't happen.
Cap said that Tony could always count on him, and Tony said nothing.
But I'm guessing you're one of those who missed that Tony said that if Ross called him, he would put him on hold because he likes the flashing lights.
Quidquid Latinae dictum sit, altum viditur. -
flashbatmanquestion — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 08:08 AM)
I think maybe you just listened to the part instead of actually watching.. Tony's body language and facial expressions changed.
No, I didn't miss that. I definitely laughed at how had of a stupid joke it was, though. -
CichlidAsh — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 04:35 PM)
And maybe you lack imagination, kido. Look carefully, you'll see superman turning his back to the wall.
I went through the film frame by frame and I could not see what you are stating here. However I would have to ask you why would a director if he wanted you to believe that Superman did not kill the Warlord film it in such a way that you would have to look so closely at the film to see that he didn't? The answer is he wouldn't if he had wanted to illustrate that Superman did not kill he would have made it clear he didn't. Instead he showed Superman putting a man through concreate walls and everyone would assume that would kill him
To make a great film you need three things - the script, the script and the script -Alfred Hitchcock -
natemans — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 05:07 PM)
The terrorist is either injured or dead. If he is neither and fine, its bs. Saying he didn't kill him is not that convincing. Plus we don't even know this character. All that the last film did was tell us who he was instead of showing us. But when they did try to show who he was, they just traded all of that character development or depth to just action scenes or the same exposition speech over and over again.
-
-
hamaniomarah — 9 years ago(December 29, 2016 06:27 AM)
No its just the logical thing that would have happened, diahrrea6. And If you don't think so, that's your opinion. You don't have to be a dick about it and insult me for thinking diffrently than you.