Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. WB..has officially strangled the JLU

WB..has officially strangled the JLU

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
27 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    brownstones — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 07:36 PM)

    What was his comment?
    =w=

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      SacrosanctPariah — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 03:15 PM)

      "They only people who would take this job now are "yes men" and inexperienced directors looking for some exposure and a big payday. "
      There was a little nodding smiley face at the end too, but I don't know how to add that in.
      My comment was going off of the assumption that he is one of those "Marvel Vs. DC" people, who thinks anything Marvel does is just and reasonable and anything DC does is garbage.
      I don't personally have anything against Peyton Reed, and I enjoyed Ant-Man. But really, it was forgettable, and didn't feel spectacular in the slightest. It felt like someone just came on board to meet a deadline, and that's exactly what it was. It happens.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        brownstones — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 03:31 PM)

        ah. I wouldn't be surprised if they get someone similar, but all you can do is wait and see who WB or Affleck (if he's actually interested) get as a replacement.
        =w=

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          syafiqjabar — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 01:54 AM)

          Nobody is concerned that fanboy pressure have made Affleck step down?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            politicidal — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 05:24 PM)

            This is part of the problem. Yea WB/DC are idiots but let's face it, DC fanboys can be rather overzealous and fussy. I don't blame Affleck for wanting to avoid that kind of pressure;especially after a flop like
            Live By Night
            .
            Whatever you are, be a good one.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              Conan-1982 — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 01:17 PM)

              At least they haven't sodomized Batman in prison.yet.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                Slam_Evil — 9 years ago(January 31, 2017 05:27 PM)

                Give it time.
                You're welcome.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups