Socialism = Lies, Ignorance & Envy
-
Soul_Venom — 1 month ago(February 05, 2026 05:18 AM)
A pin prick to the pride hurts worse than a kick in the nuts doesn't it?
Certainly seems to work on you. One pin and you grabbed the rope and hung yourself.
The “barely touch their bottom line” part depends entirely on what you mean by “a little bit.”
The factual bits (profits + headcount)
Employees: Walmart is about ~2.1 million associates worldwide (and ~1.6M in the U.S.).
“Profits” (net income): In Walmart’s fiscal years ended Jan 31:
FY2025: $20.157B consolidated net income (about $19.436B attributable to Walmart)
FY2024: $16.270B consolidated net income (about $15.511B attributable to Walmart)
FY2023: $11.292B consolidated net income (about $11.680B attributable to Walmart)
So “$20b last year, $15b the year before, $11b the year before” is close, though the more exact sequence is ~$20.2B, ~$16.3B, ~$11.3B (consolidated net income).
Does “a little bit of profit sharing” barely affect the bottom line?
Here’s what it looks like if you spread profit-sharing across ~2.1M employees:
1% of $20.2B ≈ $202M → about $96/employee/year
5% ≈ $1.0B → about $480/employee/year
10% ≈ $2.0B → about $960/employee/year
25% ≈ $5.0B → about $2,400/employee/year
So:
If “a little bit” = 1–5% of profits, yeah, it’s not enormous to Walmart’s net income, and it’s non-trivial money to many hourly workers.
If “a little bit” = 10%+, that’s not “barely touching” the bottom line anymore (it’s billions off net income / EPS).
Also: profit-sharing isn’t the same as “free money”
Any real plan has to define:
who qualifies (hourly only? full-time? tenure requirement?),
whether it’s equal per head or proportional to hours/pay,
whether it replaces/offsets other bonuses or wage increases.
Verdict:
True that Walmart is ~2M employees and profits are in the ~$11B → ~$16B → ~$20B range (depending on which net-income line you cite).
“Barely touch their bottom line” is conditionally true only for small percentages; otherwise false/overstated.
Trump is still your President. Charlie Kirk still Wins! -
Uncreative — 1 month ago(February 05, 2026 05:26 AM)
20% would bring their profits down to roughly the level it was the year before, which up to that point was their most profitable year ever. Whether you consider that as barely touching the bottom line or not is up to you. Either way you've still addressed 0% of what I asked because I genuinely want to know your thoughts. Unfortunately you people never have an answer.
