Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Disney should start to consider suing "YOUTUBERS" for Defamation

Disney should start to consider suing "YOUTUBERS" for Defamation

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
11 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Internet Films/Videos


    AnthonyRocks — 2 years ago(January 08, 2024 05:21 PM)

    I think that DISNEY should start to consider suing "YOUTUBERS" (like for example "Nerdrotic" and "Geeks + Gamers", they are some of the most toxic and negative people on YOUTUBE) for Defamation.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Jan_El_Senor — 2 years ago(January 08, 2024 05:29 PM)

      It will only bring more attention to those channels.
      Grade "A" Fully Loaded
      "Sexy as Hell"

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        AnthonyRocks — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 01:35 PM)

        Yeah, that actually is a good point.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          ./ — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 03:39 PM)

          Why, what did those channels do?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Jan_El_Senor — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 03:41 PM)

            The said Kathleen Kennedy is a peepee-head.
            Grade "A" Fully Loaded
            "Sexy as Hell"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              /.​ — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 03:44 PM)

              It's only defamation if it's not true.
              My password is password

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                AbsolutelyNOTDeliciousfeet — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 04:09 PM)

                so many problems with this anthony! the main one being there is absolutely no maligning of character going on here. opinions are being expressed on a figurehead to a publicly traded company…a company with a fiduciary responsibility to its shareholders…a figurehead that has willingly put herself into the public spotlight which opens her to public critisism. this is all first ammendment protected!
                another issue is that its not defamation if it's truths being expressed. what blatant lies are being told? all i see from the majority of these channels is displeasure at the current state of star wars. not the fandom but the product.
                the future of the franchise is grim and fans want to discuss this as fans certainly care more than the current gatekeepers of the property.
                and before we get off the rails let me say that i do not watch the channels you mention. they have a political spin that is of no interest to me. but the demise of my favorite franchise ever is important to me. for this reason i subscribe to Thor Skywalker! he is a reasonable gentleman that has issues with star wars…but only advocates the improvement of star wars at the storytelling level. he doent lean political and is very respectful to the talent behind the scenes. thats not to say he doesn't see some of the social posturing that disney engages in and discusses it…but the hostility towards those that dont agree with him is also not present. he realizes something that i dont think you do. that being…star wars is in trouble and hed like to see the ship righted. i share his views.
                🙂👍

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  /.​ — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 04:12 PM)

                  You cannot try and use logic and reason with someone highly autistic, but kudos for trying at least.
                  My password is password

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    AbsolutelyNOTDeliciousfeet — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 05:13 PM)

                    Anthony is a very nice young man. He does have some mental health issues that probably make communication difficult. I try not to bring them up as it makes him uncomfortable.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      /.​ — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 05:18 PM)

                      Very nice? Nah. He makes others very uncomfortable though with his odd obsessions. 😐
                      My password is password

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        /.​ — 2 years ago(January 09, 2024 05:38 PM)

                        You're not a fan of free speech?
                        Strange that somebody who spams sexist nonsense on a site where nobody likes him should be against freedom of expression. Weird hypocrisy.
                        And all in the defense of a corporation that doesn't give two ****s about him. You're an absolute sheep, sweetie.
                        My password is password

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0

                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups