Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. Yes it is!! Anyone agree? I love it!!!

Yes it is!! Anyone agree? I love it!!!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #41

    IMDb User

    This message has been deleted.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #42

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #43

        mbg99 — 21 years ago(June 17, 2004 01:19 PM)

        I've been sitting here with my son for the last thirty minutes reading your argument, and I just wanted to let you know that both of us have gone oxygen less for seconds at a time, due to the humor of this argument.
        A small realization for both of you, this has been off topic since the first few posts.
        BTW, we enjoyed the movie. It is not the best, but decent entertainment!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote on last edited by
          #44

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote on last edited by
            #45

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote on last edited by
              #46

              bobthegrinch — 21 years ago(June 18, 2004 10:06 AM)

              What the hell? I've not been on here for a few days cos I had a computer virus and I come back and I thought we'd actually managed to stop pointlessly digging at each other and now I hear I have some other persona and have created another account. I don't really know why I'm writing this as you probably won't believe me anyway, but I have no idea why someone would bother to create another account for the sake of a joke which I thought was over anyway. Can whoever the other guy is come back and start your own argument with this guy as I've laid mine to rest as neither of us were going to accept a loss and I thought I'd made peace with the cuddly bear. I honestly have no intention of taking our correspondence any further. I don't know what sock puppets and trolls have to do with me, but I only have one IMDB account. It's no longer anything to do with me. And for the record I do love Big Fish and it does make me cry, it's ace. My IMDB history is short simply because I don't write much stuff on it, I just check it out when I see something on telly or read something that I want to check some stuff on. Like today I read that the original Starsky (Jean Michael Glaser) directed "the running man" and I wanted to know what else he'd done. Now go and play with that other guy.
              Much Love!!!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote on last edited by
                #47

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #48

                  bobthegrinch — 21 years ago(June 18, 2004 03:16 PM)

                  I tried to bring this to an end peacefully I really did. This double identity thing you think I have is a real paranoid dellusion. If you actually think someone would do that, you must be taking this pretty seriously. I indulged you because it was funny, I could say anything and you went mad, and I apologise for that. I didn't expect you to take this so seriously. This isn't some "troll" trick to make you stop. I don't expect you to, but it's not funny anymore so I won't be indulging this bizarre argument from here on.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #49

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #50

                      Moooooooooooooooo — 20 years ago(June 12, 2005 05:16 AM)

                      laygz, every one of your posts here has been irredeemably moronic; each one offering an insight into your delusional overestimation of your own wit and intellect. You haven't managed to construct anything resembling a good argument, and you seem to think it's unacceptable to paraphrase using synonyms. Specifically, I'm assuming the word censored by IMDb as "bleep" is one that means the same as "crap" and don't give me that rubbish about it making your stance seem harsher, as if there's some sort of gradation of crap as denoted by the word used.
                      Also, I know you hate being corrected on your spelling mistakes, but the phrase is "sticking your oar in", not "ore in". How the hell does someone stick their "ore" in? You idiot. (Referring to a particular post, you said that you'd only spent five minutes on it. That's actually a lot of time to write the crap that you come out with. Are you mentally subnormal?) Then you cry foul at bobthegrinch's use of "sad little forum pest" as if he was trying to pass it off as his own insult, when it would be clear to all but the most challenged that his use of the phrase was a reference to your own.
                      Finally, I can only assume that the peanut butter fantasies are a projection of your own desires. Why else would you conjure up such a peculiar perversion? Many a true word spoken in jest and all that. You also need to check your priorities if you're prepared to pursue a petty internet quarrel ad infinitum. Several of your posts have been updated minutes or even hours after originally being posted. Clearly you don't spend as little time on the posts as you claim, as you are evidently mulling over the little polished turds that are your posts even hours after squeezing them out. Do you even have a life beyond being a boorish bore on the internet?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups