Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The IMDb Archives
  3. 'Evil never looked so good'

'Evil never looked so good'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The IMDb Archives
3 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film and Television Discussion


    Tales-from-the-Goondocks — 15 years ago(March 22, 2011 10:13 AM)

    Really? a 14 year old girl is the best evil can look? The tagline alone makes me think that the nature of this project has always been an exploitative one. Of course I'm talking of the sexualization of a 14 yo girl to lure men into watching this movie. And in a way it succeeded with me since now I'm gonna watch it just to see what I'm criticizing (you guessed it, I haven't even watched it). But of course even without seeing the movie you can just know what the filmmakers were aiming for just by reading that tagline.
    And I know the girl was probably about 16 or 17 when it was filmed but she was still playing a 14 yo girl.
    And by the way, I'm a 22 yo heterosexual non-christian male. So, think of that before you start saying that I'm a tightass christian imposing my beliefs or something.
    My Completely Biased Top 250 Favorite Movies
    http://www.imdb.com/list/KU4T5sDsmRk

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      werder_bunny — 9 years ago(May 11, 2016 03:35 PM)

      You're certainly right about that. It's sexualizing young girls. I guess that was still "legal" in 1997.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        jbaker1-2 — 6 months ago(September 21, 2025 03:02 AM)

        Just because you're a 22-year-old heterosexual non-Christian doesn't mean you can't be a tight-ass. 😉
        There are 8.2 billion people in the world. 8.19 billion of them have never heard of and don't give a fuck about Charlie Kirk. Get over it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups