An unrealistic funny movie with a lot of Nudity.,,,and SMALL PENISES!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — General Discussion
cubasterd — 16 years ago(July 02, 2009 02:03 PM)
Ok, so it wouldn't have been good without the loads of nudity and sexual content but it was funny and COMPLETELY unrealistic. Its a stupid movie but it does have its laughs. There is too much nudity so you might only want to watch this with someone you're beep very close friends, or alone not for family members.
The funniest ,most unintentional, part of the movie was all the guys having SMALL COCKS! LOL ALL of them!! That guy during the 4some cock was like 2-3 inches long and they had the nerve to have him doing a sex scene with him and the girl both standing..lol THAT IS IMPOSSIBLE WITH HIS ITTY-BITTY PENIS!
Did they go out of their way to get guys with small cocks that was hilarious -
zebrabungle — 16 years ago(July 04, 2009 08:20 PM)
So speaks the voice of experience, I heard they wanted to get you but needed more then a inch and a quarterso no, this time they did not go out of their way.but hey, better luck next time Wee "where is it?" Willy.
"Durka my Gherkin or I'll Jihad your Dad" -
sdsungod — 16 years ago(July 28, 2009 09:04 PM)
Haven't seen this, just saw the box and thought "that girl on the cover is totally sexy" and I happen to like funny stories with my boobie flicks. So I came here to see if the movie is both sexy and also funny. Then I found out there are penises in it? Why do they include penis in a movie that is obviously intended for straight guys who watch just to see a sexy pair of boobies?
"Enough of that technical talk, Foo!" -
blackthirteen — 16 years ago(February 20, 2010 03:01 AM)
were you one of the guys in the movie?
LoL, I thought the same thing! Even if he wasn't, he must have a small wang to have reacted like that.
We belong to each other now. For betterfor worselike loveonly real. -
blue_spawn — 16 years ago(September 19, 2009 09:52 PM)
fyi: the size of a penis has little to do with sexual pleasure. 90% of the vagina has no nerve endings.
As Yoda the Jedi Master once put it:
Size matters not, for my ally is the force and a powerful ally it is. -
whynot2 — 16 years ago(September 22, 2009 06:36 AM)
well, technically speaking, you are absolutely correct.
But, on the other hand, why do guys tend to likefirm, pert boobies, flat tummies, long legs, smallish bums, hourglass figures, etc
to the extent that 'sexual pleasure' focuses on those nerve endings 'down there', none of those things should matter either.
'sexual pleasure' deals with a whole lot more than 'those' nerve endings; there's a lot of other nerve endings involved, and a whole lot of, shall we say, psychology involved, too. -
blue_spawn — 16 years ago(September 28, 2009 10:56 PM)
Typically when you hear people refer to penis size it's a judgement on how good someone is in bed. My point being that it's a complete BS. You can have a smaller than average equipment and be a master in the sack.
That being said, I understand where you're coming from with sexual pleasure being psychological. -
somewhereovertheturnip — 16 years ago(February 19, 2010 01:45 PM)
Na, I've slept with a fair few women over the years, and every single one of them without fail has said they enjoy a decent sized willy a lot more than a small one.
It's not about nerve endings alone, it's about much more than that. Masculinity vs femininity for one.
Sure, you can have a 10 incher and be a novice, and you can have a stump and be a god, but that's not to say you can't have the best of both!
-
sarcasm83 — 15 years ago(April 25, 2010 07:39 AM)
yeah, but it's just simple logic that a bigger tool massages a bigger part of that "10% you claim to have nerve endings" AKA it stimulates the vagina more thurally. (Sorry for stating the obvious)
AND what you said is totally wrong. The outer parts of the vagina has 90% of all the vagina's nerve endings and only 10% are inside the actual vaginal "tunnel".
Therefore, whole 100% of a vagina has nerve endings. Just 90% of em are on the 1/3 portion of the vagina, around the "entrance"
So in that sense; If you're too big to fit your tool fully inside a girl, your stomach and balls and whatever never touch her "outer vagina bits" and therefor it results to a lesser amount of pleasure for the girl. Too small and the 10% inside aren't fully massaged, again not resulting to much pleasure.
So I'd say the basic medium sized penis is the one to go with, eventually.
And even if you know how to touch a vagina from all the right places, you still have to figure out individually with every girl what the girl likes and get the whole mental side right, which is a HUGE portion of the whole thing.
Is "it" big enough for her liking visually..
Is it big enough to stimulate her down there
do you know how to touch her with your hands
are you fat or skinny or normal or muscular enough
is your personal hygiene what she likes..
[honestly, one girl made me brush my teeth before sex, even though my teeth are fine and another actually prefered me to NOT have a shower when I had sweat up coz she had a thing for sweat.. wtf.
I want a CASE SPECIFIC MANUAL FOR EVERY GIRL :|)
.. does she like talking dirty..
does she not like her legs to be spread too much open coz she's embarrassed for some reason EVERYTHING CAN BE A FACTOR EVERYTHING Man why can't girls be like men I mean I can cum if a girl isn't FRANKENSTEIN and just puts my penis in her mouth and doesn't bite. Or inserts my penis in her and rides around a while, pretty much no matter how. (Sure the level of satisfaction can change, but I'm still EASY.)
But making a girl cum ROCKETSCIENCE! I mean.. it requires AT LEAST 1.21 GIGAWATTS! And we all know that's nearly impossible. You can't just walk into any grocery store for your quick fix of plutonium and no one can predict where a lightning strikes! I.. think I lost track at some point
BUT ANYWAY; that's why I just fap. No hassle. And I always win. Girls are too damn complicated for me to bother with em right now. (Been a single for a few years the first time in my life [I'm 26.. came out of the womb just to land on a babygirl. Who woulda thought?! Well no.
Just meant "my whole life" as in first time in a LONG time.])
And damn I'm happy to be satisfied with my penis. Man it would suck to have one of those micropenises.. I mean only seeing an image of one makes me sad.
Hey, maybe I should buy my penis a cake to show my appreciation for once!. wait, what did I just -
FairlyTwisted — 15 years ago(January 02, 2011 07:20 AM)
I like your post, you must be good in bed. It's nice to know there are guys out there who know it actually takes knowledge to make a woman have an orgasm. But no woman should expect a man to know it all by himself. Like you said, every woman is different and every woman should tell (directly or indirectly) her man how to satisfy her. Otherwise, it's her loss. It's really not rocketscience, it only depends on how open a girl is to talk about herself that way. I'm still working on that one
But you seem to know some facts, that's cool. Don't give up on women just yet.
P.S.- I like Back to the Future too!
Jesus is coming-look busy! -
rbhatia1984 — 14 years ago(June 27, 2011 11:39 AM)
this movie was like those fake erotic stories which i used to read on porn sites when we had only pics and not videos, when most of the times, our imagination was at work
in fact i think the script of this movie has been taken from various 3rd rate stupid erotic stories, and then mixed into 1
only thing that kept me watching the movie was nudity, and hope to watch a good sex scene