Subtext?
-
toocoolmac — 9 years ago(August 02, 2016 08:11 AM)
You behave like that ass that Buzz Aldrin punched in the mouth, because he was so drunk on the Apollo moon landing conspiracy BS that he got in Buzz's face and received an attitude adjustment he was begging for
And that's one example of a conspiracy theory that has been cleanly debunked. Yet, no amount of evidence will persuade the loyal tin foil hat wearer.
There is a strong movement fighting against FGM, as there should be. They're making some progress. If you're serious about raising consciousness on what you believe to be true about male circumcision, you might garner more sympathy towards the cause by aligning forces with activists against FGM, instead of being insensitive of their suffering, and showing an us against them mentality.
Evidence is pretty clear that there were no WMD's. Evidence for the extreme assertion that you're making about the foreskin being the primary sense organ of the penis, and equating its removal to that of FGM, is weak. Studies on sensitivity comparing cut and uncut men are inconclusive and contradictory.
Perhaps those that were circumcised as infants don't generally report sexual dysfunction, because the plasticity of the developing brain compensates by rewiring the receptors of other areas like the glans, to do the work of whatever receptors may have been lost by the removal of the foreskin. I was doing a little reading on FGM last night, and one site claimed that over 80% of mutilated women were able to adapt and still enjoy sex and achieve orgasm. Good for them, but the practice of FGM is still abominable and should be stamped out.
I have my doubts about male circumcision as well, but I'm not convinced it's on an equal footing as FGM.
If you're really convinced you're right, perhaps you should focus your message board efforts somewhere more appropriate than one about movies. And if you really care about changing minds, then don't squander your credibility with all your inflammatory hate speech BS that most of your posts consist of. I don't think you really care about the circumcision issue as more than a device to use to troll people with, like your other posts. I suspect you're primarily interested in the "winning of a debate", than about changing minds and possibly sparing millions of baby boys from being robbed of their full sexual experience when they mature, if you're right. -
devotee-2 — 9 years ago(August 01, 2016 03:37 PM)
Is is only coincidental that she's called Eva?
Surely it couldn't be coincidence that another main character's name is
Eli
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eli_(biblical_figure)
I'm still searching for someone named Stan in the Bible, unless Jean Hegland went too obvious with the
Stan/Satan
wordplay