Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o

I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years o

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
7 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Avatar: Fire and Ash


    MistaWeek — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:06 PM)

    I thought the first one (2009) was ****ing amazing and was hyped for a sequel but the constant delays pushing it years out until the first sequel was 13 years later..yeah that pretty much killed it for me. I haven't even watched the second one at all not a shred of interest.
    VLAD LOVES UNDERAGE BOYS JUST LIKE HIS DADDY USED TO.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      huwdj — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:10 PM)

      I loved the first, was quite disappointed by the second - but I will be turning up for the 3rd - preferably with an empty bladder, a large coffee and some treats.
      I have always depended on the kindness of Strangers - and the bastards let me down!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        (SNoW) — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:12 PM)

        Second one was objectively better than the first.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          NZer — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:14 PM)

          I watched the second one and don't remember a thing about it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Chicxulub — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:19 PM)

            I didn't give a **** about the first one as a movie. The 3D effects were impressive, though (at the time). I would've watched a timely sequel, but not now.
            Every 3D experience I had after that was pointless at best and headache inducingly awful at worst.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Tits Malone, PI — 4 months ago(November 27, 2025 07:45 PM)

              No, not even before the first one.
              Donna/LadyGigi Savige needs to sit her ass down!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                AnthonySoxxx — 4 months ago(December 02, 2025 09:32 PM)

                No one. That's why the sequel only made a little over 2 billion dollars at the box office.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups