Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Here is the main problem IMO,

Here is the main problem IMO,

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
5 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Now You See Me


    stonekeeper_ever — 10 years ago(November 29, 2015 02:52 PM)

    The scene with the car crash on the bridge: Dylan Stayed near the car while it was on fire until seconds before it exploded and sent him rolling over the hood of his own car. Since he knew that was part of the trick the only reason he risked his life is to fool us. This plus the part where he fights Franco plus the scene where he shoots his gone and the girl push his arm plus the scene where he gets angry drunk = Too much bull crap just to fool us.
    Could have been 7/10 if the end did not take us for dummies.
    Final score: 6/10
    Excuse my English, I am French-Canadian

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      markfilipak — 10 years ago(March 14, 2016 07:17 PM)

      stonekeeper_ever wrote:
      I am French-Canadian
      Well, make up your mind.


      I don't have a dog. And furthermore, my dog doesn't bite. And furthermore, you provoked him.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        ellscashncarry — 9 years ago(June 29, 2016 05:05 PM)

        Absolutely nailed it. This is my major issue too There were far too many scenes (such as those you mentioned) which, given we now n know who Mark Ruffallo's character really is, don't actually make sense, but were included to throw us off the scent.
        I'm sure the filmmakers might argue this was part of their own misdirection to us the viewer, but I'm not convinced that was their actual intention.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          federicodesilets — 9 years ago(June 30, 2016 09:34 PM)

          While these actions do enable the audience to assume they know the role he is playing, he is doing all the things to sell his role to the other characters in the film. I don't really think this is that complicated.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            stonekeeper_ever — 9 years ago(June 30, 2016 09:47 PM)

            I think he could've played his game way smarter. He definitely did not need to do all those extreme actions. Especially walking near a car about to explode.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups