Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Rated at 6.2? How on earth?

Rated at 6.2? How on earth?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
20 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Taken 2


    rabbitmoon — 12 years ago(July 18, 2013 05:15 AM)

    There are movies that I really like that are less than 6.2. I just don't understand how it could be just two-tenths or so away from something like the Godfather.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Mad-Max2 — 12 years ago(July 20, 2013 12:01 PM)

      Granted the film wasn't anywhere near as good as the first one, but I think you could give it a 5 or 6 just based on the Liam Neeson kicking ass scenes alone.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        stephen_chow79 — 12 years ago(August 01, 2013 12:11 AM)

        Its partly my fault, I gave it an 8

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          rabbitmoon — 12 years ago(August 02, 2013 01:50 AM)

          I think you've done a bad thing. GET ON THE NAUGHTY STEP.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            MisterKorman — 12 years ago(August 01, 2013 09:35 PM)

            I just watched it. It was horrible. 4/10

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              seans_life — 12 years ago(October 22, 2013 02:29 PM)

              I just watched it. It was horrible. 4/10
              No way it was a 4/10 movie. The acting was generally ok ,although at times Liam Neeson bothers me with his personality being pretty corpse like, the story was easy to understand and although the bad guys made some stupid mistakes well I guess amateurs will make stupid mistakes but I gave this movie a 6/10 because I just found it hard to believe they would not make sure Liam Neeson didn't have that cellphone or other things on him when his wife in the movie and him were captured and left in that room.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                sackofwhine — 11 years ago(October 05, 2014 02:31 AM)

                The story sucks the acting is bland and boring to watch and worst of all, the action is filmed in such an amateurish and incomprehensible manner, so you have no idea what is going on!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  jkono29 — 12 years ago(August 08, 2013 10:00 PM)

                  There are movies that I really like that are less than 6.2. I just don't understand how it could be just two-tenths or so away from something like the Godfather.
                  The Godfather is at 9.2

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    TheBeardedWonder — 12 years ago(August 09, 2013 06:07 PM)

                    Yeah what's the OP talking about? This has a D, Godfather has an A. Sounds about right. What more do they want?
                    "What? Do you wanna just sit around and be wrong?" - Liz Lemon

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      eomahir — 11 years ago(December 05, 2014 04:58 PM)

                      I like Liam Neeson very much. Taken was a good movie and I gave it 8/10. But taken 2 was a disappointment, with a poor plot and so many unacceptable mistakes. 3/10, this is what I gave Taken 2.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        IMDb User

                        This message has been deleted.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          Dark_Phoenix89 — 11 years ago(January 17, 2015 07:09 AM)

                          8/10 from me; I think it actually underrated in all honesty. Its not as good as the first (or as emotional), but it still delivers its share of awesome moments, and I liked Rade Sherebedaga as the main antagonist Murad (thought it was a nice touch having him be related to Marco, the main kidnapper from the first).
                          "Speak of the Devil, and He shall appear."

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            gregglop09 — 11 years ago(March 27, 2015 03:12 AM)

                            7.5 for me

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              IMDb User

                              This message has been deleted.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                IMDb User

                                This message has been deleted.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  Vondaz — 10 years ago(July 08, 2015 07:36 AM)

                                  Totally agree. I thought Taken 1 was rubbish, but this is even worse. I don't know why I watched it. Wooden acting (even Neeson), poorly filmed action scenes, corny scenes with his so called ex wife and HUGE plot holes.
                                  My main problem? Neeson is 60!! He just doesn't cut it as an action hero.
                                  I gave it 4/10.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    rabbitmoon — 10 years ago(July 08, 2015 08:04 AM)

                                    Wow - you need to stay WELL clear of Taken 3.
                                    The only times you should risk it showing:

                                    • Someone has burned your house down, you manage to find them, and have them tied up until the authorities arrive. You don't want to physically injure them for legal reasons, but a little torture is much needed. You can then show it to them.
                                    • Aliens invade. They kidnap you, and tell you that they wish to terminate the earth, because they're jealous of any other talent existing in the universe. They demand that you prove that humans are untalented, to leave earth alone. Then, and only then, should you show them Taken 3.
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      Strazdamonas — 9 years ago(April 18, 2016 10:38 AM)

                                      The average rating on IMDB is 7. This means that a 6.2 indicates a bellow average movie score.
                                      Applied Science? All science is applied. Eventually.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        rabbitmoon — 9 years ago(April 18, 2016 10:55 AM)

                                        Yeah but it should WAY below average.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          amdew717 — 9 years ago(July 22, 2016 07:35 AM)

                                          You guys are insanethis is a hilarious thread!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups