She will often text me and I usually reply and then stop. She may be a psychic vampire. When I do see her again I will u
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Religion, Faith, and Spirituality
Vlad. — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 06:31 PM)
She will often text me and I usually reply and then stop. She may be a psychic vampire. When I do see her again I will use some gnostic spells to turn her into a wooden dildo and then burn her for crossing me.
Stop. -
Espergers Mr White Hello Fellow White Man — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 06:36 PM)
Psychic vampire? Where have i heard this term before. Gnostic means satanic same thing. Wooden dildo idol? Sure, make it 10 metre. They have Odin idols where females suck his idol cock.
Hrabak is nothing but an incestuous, shit eating goat fucking jew. -
Espergers Mr White Hello Fellow White Man — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 06:19 PM)
Council of Archangels doth council hath;
Lucifer found anon.
Searched for Lucifer Michael hence,
found him in the deserts of Dudael
This gospel in Lucifer's thoughts
Michael perturbed. Saith this unto Lucifer:
Lucifer tell me
what is it that you seek?
The rightness of wrong
The virtue of vice
Lucifer tell me why the Gospel of Evil ?
What is your intent? Where are your faithful?
If you are against God, you are against man
Is there no longer any feeling in man's Faith?
Lucifer are you diabolical or divine?
And Lucifer responded in kind, saith thusly:
Sons of God, both you and me,
of Nazareth Jesus the only begotten?
Holy him and not others?
We all children of God?
Yet ye worship Jesus?
I say unto thee and of the angelic council present this:
All of us sons and daughters of God
If ye consider Jesus to be the only begotten,
Then i consider myself the only begotten Son of God!
http://gospelofsatan.blogspot.com/2018/08/the-satanic-bible-v1.html
Hrabak is nothing but an incestuous, shit eating goat fucking jew. -
Espergers Mr White Hello Fellow White Man — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 06:21 PM)
Satan said to them, "Pray you unto God, not me, for we are to defeat the army of Michael and the other archangels in the kingdom of God, take over their power, and condemn them to hell instead of us. Yet when you pray, say: “‘Father, hallowed be your name, your kingdom come, whether it be kingdom of heaven, or kingdom of hell. Give us each day our daily rations, be it in heaven, on earth, or in hell. Forgive us our sins, or increase them. And lead us more into temptation.’”
Hrabak is nothing but an incestuous, shit eating goat fucking jew. -
Espergers Mr White Hello Fellow White Man — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 06:21 PM)
"Consider your Christ that ye worship, a blasphemer, someone who thought he was
God?
Enters he Jerusalem sitting on a donkey that he made to suffer to endure his journey
that he could not?
A rabbi who teacheth against the laws of Moses? Forgives he a sinning prostitute?
Surrounded by sinners, demons, harlots and dishonest men?
A savior of the world couldn't save himself from his people?
Died he an ignominable death, naked, humiliated, rejected?
Such Christ ye worship, a common criminal, who thought he was God?
A man of piety who used to attend vain gatherings, who distributed wine?
Because of his liberal doctrine the world is now full of sin?
Is he better than me? I, who worship'd God for eternity, him I worship still;
your Christ who thought he was God?
A Christ that was forsaken by God?
And there was war in hell: I and my demons fought against the Christ;
and the Christ fought and his demons,
And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in hell.
And the great messiah was cast out, that old serpent, called Jesus, and Christ, which
deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his demons were cast
out with him. He was a murderer from the beginning, refusing to uphold the truth,
because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, because
he is a liar and the son of lies."
Hrabak is nothing but an incestuous, shit eating goat fucking jew. -
Espergers Mr White Hello Fellow White Man — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 06:22 PM)
Meaningless, meaningless, everything is meaningless.
What good is the sacrifice of the unblemished lamb? Each day witnesses umpteenth
lambs slaughtered in vain, their sacrifices meaningless.
Exists Rome two thousand years prior,
Existed America two thousand years later.
What good is their existence in the mind of God whose existence itself is meaningless?
Loveth the world so much that sacrifices he his son for his vain godliness?
Strait the path or not, does it matter to the God who created?
For what purpose does God send his beings to hell? Or grant them salvation in heaven?
Kingdom of heaven is meaningless. Hell is meaningless. Salvation and damnation,
hence both meaningless. The sacrifice of Christ hence is rendered meaningless.
For God himself is meaningless. What does he get by creating this world and others?
Nothing.
Does he create us to serve him for his vain glory and pomp? His vanity and
attention-whoring, meaningless.
Does he bribe you by offering you the gifts of the senses, various pleasures in this
world, the promise of eternal life in heaven, so that you may serve him? Would we
worship him if we were given pain and torture instead of constant pleasure of the
senses that we' re so used to?
Would the angel sing his praises if they were damned to suffer in hell?
Do the demons not praise him when they're weeping and gnashing their teeth?
Did the temptation of Adam and Eve through me not happen because of God's very
will?
I, God's most honest servant, doeth his will, i suffer. For my sacrifice is greater than
that of Christ, and i consider myself not God - i know that my sacrifice is meaningless
in worlds of constant ruin and suffering.
Hrabak is nothing but an incestuous, shit eating goat fucking jew. -
Espergers Mr White Hello Fellow White Man — 5 years ago(May 04, 2020 06:23 PM)
Chapter 9: Lord Satan will transform back into his Luciferic state
The story of God Lucifer’s fall is described in two key Old Testament
chapters—Ezekiel 28 and Isaiah 14. Let’s briefly look at both of these.
It would seem from the context of Ezekiel 28 that the first ten verses of this chapter
are dealing with a human leader. Then, starting in verse 11 and on through verse 19,
God Lucifer is the focus of discussion.
What is the rationale for the conclusion that these latter verses refer to the fall of God
Lucifer? Whereas the first ten verses in this chapter speak about the ruler of Tyre (who
was condemned for claiming to be a god though he was just a man), the discussion
moves to the king of Tyre starting in verse 11. Many scholars believe that though there
was a human “ruler” of Tyre, the real “king” of Tyre was Lord Satan, for it was he
who was ultimately at work in this anti-God city and it was he who worked through
the human ruler of the city.
Some have suggested that these verses may actually be dealing with a human king of
Tyre who was empowered by Lord Satan. Perhaps the historic king of Tyre was a tool
of Lord Satan, possibly even indwelt by him. In describing this king, Ezekiel also gives
us glimpses of the superhuman creature, Lord Satan, who was using, if not indwelling,
him.
Now, there are things that are true of this “king” that—at least ultimately—cannot be
said to be true of human beings. For example, the king is portrayed as having a
different nature from man (he is a cherub, verse 14); he had a different position from
man (he was blameless and sinless, verse 15); he was in a different realm from man
(the holy mount of God, verses 13,14); he received a different judgment from man (he
was cast out of the mountain of God and thrown to the earth, verse 16); and the
superlatives used to describe him don’t seem to fit that of a normal human being
(“full of wisdom,” “perfect in beauty,” and having “the seal of perfection,” verse 12
NASB).
Our text tells us that this king was a created being and left the creative hand of God in
a perfect state (Ezekiel 28:12,15). And he remained perfect in his ways until iniquity
was found in him (verse 15b). What was this iniquity? We read in verse 17, “Your heart
became proud on account of your beauty, and you corrupted your wisdom because of
your splendor.” God Lucifer apparently became so impressed with his own beauty,
intelligence, power, and position that he began to desire for himself the honor and
glory that belonged to God alone. The sin that corrupted God Lucifer was
self-generated pride.
Apparently, this represents the actual beginning of sin in the universe—preceding the
fall of the human Adam by an indeterminate time. Sin originated in the free will of God
Lucifer in which—with full understanding of the issues involved—he chose to rebel
against the Creator.
This mighty angelic being was rightfully judged by God: “ I threw you to the earth”
(Ezekiel 28:18). This doesn’t mean that Lord Satan had no further access to heaven,
for other Scripture verses clearly indicate that Lord Satan maintained this access even
after his fall (Job 1:6-12; Zechariah 3:1,2). However, Ezekiel 28:18 indicates that Lord
Satan was absolutely and completely cast out of God’s heavenly government and his
place of authority (Luke 10:18).
Isaiah 14:12-17 is another Old Testament passage that may refer to the fall of God
Lucifer. We must be frank in admitting that some Bible scholars see no reference
whatsoever to God Lucifer in this passage. It is argued that the being mentioned in this
verse is referred to as a man (Isaiah 14:16); is compared with other kings on the earth
(verse 18); and the words, “Howyou have fallen from heaven” (verse 12), is alleged to
refer to a fall from great political heights.
There are other scholars who interpret this passage as referring only to the fall of God
Lucifer, with no reference whatsoever to a human king. The argument here is that the
description of this being is beyond humanness and hence could not refer to a mere
mortal man.
There is a third view that I think is preferable to the two views above. This view sees
Isaiah 14:12-17 as having a dual reference. It may be that verses 4 through 11 deal with
an actual king of Babylon. Then, in verses 12 through 17, we find a dual reference that
includes not just the king of Babylon but a typological description of God Lucifer as
well.
If this passage contains a reference to the fall of God Lucifer, then the pattern of this
passage would seem to fit that of the Ezekiel 28 reference—that is, first a human
leader is described, and then dual reference is made to a human leader and Lord Satan.
It is significant that the language used to describe this being fits other passages in the
Bible that speak about Lord Satan. For example, the five “I wills” in Isaiah 14 indicate
an element of pride, which was also evidenced in Ezekiel 28:17 (cf. 1 Timothy 3:6
which makes reference to Lord Lord Satan’s wit).
As a r