Religious stance or not…
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Milk
tskivolocki — 12 years ago(December 10, 2013 04:04 PM)
Homosexuality is NOT okay at all!!!! The follwing can be applied to any religious or non religious stance: Men can't reproduce with men and women can't with women. Dictionary defs. of marry and marrige only mention husband and wife/man and woman. Why is it okay to condemn all the other ways that kill us off? But not homosexuality? That kills too! (Men can't reproduce with men and women can't with women.) So condemning all ways of sometyhing except onethat isn't equality. That sounds more like double standard loving hypocrisy. And I find it funny how critics never want to answer as to why it's okay to condemn all the other ways except homosexuality.
But if you are religious: No Bible verse mentions same sex anything being condoned. Only condemned. Only hetero is looked upon with goodness. But if you are a different religion or non religious you would think that the diety or concept that crated us happened to make it possible for men to reproduce with men and women with womenbut that's not the case. So excuse us who don't want society to be killed off! -
ah_cynicism — 12 years ago(February 21, 2014 05:51 PM)
In that case, by your logic, you should also be condemning heterosexuals who are infertile, or who choose not to have children. Why does everything have to be about reproduction?
Besides, the world is becoming overpopulated, so it's a good job that not everybody reproduces. I don't see what's so great about the human race continuing forever, anyway. -
wylierichardson-966-922691 — 10 years ago(April 01, 2016 06:53 PM)
What you seem to be suggesting here is that gayness is a kind of dysfunction. It is, from a scientific point of view. That doesn't explain why some folks are born gay, tho. It's likely that we will always have gay people - closed or otherwise- with us. All the verbal condemnation you can muster wont change that.