Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Too bad it's not just a suggestion system. It actively helps censor what we see.

Too bad it's not just a suggestion system. It actively helps censor what we see.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
4 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — This Film Is Not Yet Rated


    FilmKoala — 11 years ago(July 05, 2014 06:59 PM)

    Too bad it's not just a suggestion system. It actively helps censor what we see.
    Oh well, at least we live in an age where there is easy access to films not rated by the MPAA. And it's ten times better than the Hays Code.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      ultimatenexus — 11 years ago(August 06, 2014 02:56 PM)

      Any restrictive censorship organization like the Hays Code or the MPAA or the Comics Code of Authority, etc. are terrible and overstep their boundaries. I mean what gives them the right to restrict releases for NC-17 rated movies? They force cuts, make things very difficult for people who don't do things their way, which in my opinion is just plain wrong.
      The Comics Code of Authority was terrible, too. You couldn't even have the word 'Horror' in your title! Still, I've noticed a few loopholes comic book companies still managed to make (the Batman comics were still pretty violent).


      Welcome to the middle of nowhere-
      -the center of everywhere.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        killian_d — 10 years ago(February 06, 2016 12:24 AM)

        The biggest problem I have with the MPAA is that it's not a definitive code. If you aren't given clear definition of what is and is not acceptable under your code it is extremely open to incorrect interpretation and abuse.
        Give filmmakers sets of rules to follow and go from there.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          TMC-4 — 10 years ago(January 18, 2016 12:54 AM)

          http://www.trekbbs.com/threads/why-was-tmp-g-rated.273628/page-6#post-11177178
          Late 1960s
          *G - Most mainstream movies
          *M - Edgy movies
          *R - Very edgy movies
          *X - Even edgier movies
          Early 1980s (before PG-13)
          *G - Kids' movies
          *PG - Most mainstream movies
          *R - Horror movies, Sex comedies, art movies, hard-core action movies
          *X - Porn
          Today
          *G - Animated kids' movies
          *PG - Live action kids' movies
          *PG13 - Most mainstream movies, including stuff as mild as The Devil Wears Prada and some of the Harry Potter films, as well as stuff as brutally violent as Taken, and everything in between. Almost all summer action movies go here.
          *R - Slasher movies, sex comedies, art movies
          *NC17 - Really edgy art movies

          1 Reply Last reply
          0

          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • Users
          • Groups