This whole problem could been solved so easily
-
preachcaleb — 9 years ago(January 25, 2017 03:38 PM)
Yes, it is better. At least his people won't be butchered.
No, it wouldn't. Even if they manage to blow up one of them to that extent (which is assuming they are be destroyed through conventional means, the ones we saw reacquired the Fist of Doom and a ghost possessing one of their own and even that didm;t stop them), there is a massive army of them.
We saw Liz using guns on them, so they can be taken out with conventional means. And it's not a massive army. It's 70 x 70. 4900. That's small.
Except for the fact they're indestructible. You're not gonna be able to disintegrate them.
If bullets can blow parts off them, a nuclear explosion will leave nothing of them.
Yet, is happy to kill her its pointless keeping her alive when her brother's death would kill her anyway.
Nope. He's not happy at all about it. And again, the brother was to be executed, not her. But he was just too good a fighter.
We've already established he's a retard.
Not at all.
Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead. -
JasonRebourne — 9 years ago(February 04, 2017 07:45 AM)
Yes, it is better. At least his people won't be butchered.
But they would still die.
We saw Liz using guns on them, so they can be taken out with conventional means. And it's not a massive army. It's 70 x 70. 4900. That's small.
Except they would they would repair almost instantly.
If bullets can blow parts off them, a nuclear explosion will leave nothing of them.
Blowing parts of them off would the most they can do, they would just come back together and continue attacking.
Nope. He's not happy at all about it. And again, the brother was to be executed, not her. But he was just too good a fighter.
More reason to kill her. Plus, he was happy to let his people die like a coward. He deserved to die.
I don't care about a troll who doesn't pay for his opinion telling me how to review movies. -
preachcaleb — 9 years ago(February 06, 2017 06:14 AM)
But they would still die.
We all die. But we're not all slaughtered. There's a difference.
Except they would they would repair almost instantly.
Except the movie showed that it is not instantly. The parts have to crawl to each other. The farther away, the longer it takes.
Blowing parts of them off would the most they can do
No. A nuclear explosion would disintegrate them.
More reason to kill her. Plus, he was happy to let his people die like a coward. He deserved to die.
Incorrect. He wasn't happy about it, nor was he a coward.
Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead. -
JasonRebourne — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 05:45 AM)
We all die. But we're not all slaughtered. There's a difference.
That's retarded.
Except the movie showed that it is not instantly. The parts have to crawl to each other. The farther away, the longer it takes.
But they would do so.
No. A nuclear explosion would disintegrate them.
Prove it.
Incorrect. He wasn't happy about it, nor was he a coward.
A king who lets his enemy walk over his people and allow his people to die for stupid reasons is a coward.
I don't care about a troll who doesn't pay for his opinion telling me how to review movies. -
preachcaleb — 9 years ago(February 10, 2017 08:35 AM)
That's retarded.
No. There actually is a difference between dying and being killed.
But they would do so.
Not instantaneously, as you claimed.
Prove it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_explosion
A king who lets his enemy walk over his people and allow his people to die for stupid reasons is a coward.
Incorrect. That's not what happened. They weren't enemies. There was a peace. A peace the king and his people implemented since they had won the original war.
Seize the moment, 'cause tomorrow you might be dead.