Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Original 1950 version much better

Original 1950 version much better

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
5 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Cheaper by the Dozen


    D_Ray_Morton — 11 years ago(March 08, 2015 08:30 PM)

    Today's problem remaking classics always leaving the viewer feeling ripped off I like Steve Martin a lot especially The Jerk and Dead Men Don't wear plaid but Clifton Webb and Myrna Loy are irreplaceable

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      nerevar59 — 10 years ago(July 04, 2015 10:14 AM)

      Steve Martin is so wrong for this movie.Just as bad as Father of the Bride.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        DarcyBrandon — 10 years ago(August 15, 2015 08:24 PM)

        I love the original so much and I was hesitant to watch this remake.
        The remake was a real let down. The original was so cute and sweet, I wish the remake didn't go for all the slapstick.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          robert-macc — 10 years ago(October 24, 2015 06:14 PM)

          This wasn't a remake but an adaption of the book.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            MissMellieY — 9 years ago(August 29, 2016 11:42 AM)

            To me, it wasn't even THAT. They basically gave Gilbreth and Carey credit for the TITLE. The only thing the same was that there were 12 children. The Gilbreth parents (in the original) were REAL people who were pioneers in their field of industrial engineering (and Dr. Lillian Moller Gilbreth was the first industrial/organizational psychologist.) To me, they should have just called this movie something different. It could have really been a good movie if they had stuck with the real story (even if it was likely embellished a bit).
            "A man's kiss is his signature" Mae West

            1 Reply Last reply
            0

            • Login

            • Don't have an account? Register

            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • Users
            • Groups