Why was Satan a woman?
-
Navaros — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 12:27 PM)
Apologetics tap dancing
On the contrary,
you
are the one who tap dances around the facts that your acts of dissembly are always false.
Satan is never called by the name Lucifer in the Bible
Sure he is. As we've just seen, Isaiah does exactly that!
Satan is
generally
not called by the name Lucifer in the Bible because during the time-span that
most
of the Bible covers, Satan had
already lost
his name of Lucifer. Lucifer is a name of honor & glory and to call Satan by that name
now- as if he still owns that name - would be a grave spiritual error. That is why only Satanists who know they are headed straight for Hell do so, and why no one else does so.
Isaiah presents textual evidence that the person being taunted is not an eternal being, but a human king
You are continuing your dissembly which the article has already addressed. Isaiah is addressed at some times to a human king, and at other times to Lucifer/Satan. You dishonestly are pretending the the former is representative of the whole, even though you know full-well that it is not.
utilizing allegory and metaphor and poetic language.
Now you are just making crap up, crap which my previously-cited, God-approved article has already debunked.
Edited by men with an apparent agenda.
If they have an agenda, it is the the polar opposite of yours: theirs is to declare the truth of God accurately. Yours, however, is to pretend that Word of God says whatever you want it to say, and deceive others into believing that it does, based upon what your evil agenda wishes to be so.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman
- as if he still owns that name - would be a grave spiritual error. That is why only Satanists who know they are headed straight for Hell do so, and why no one else does so.
-
mamu2 — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 12:57 PM)
Satan is generally not called by the name Lucifer in the Bible because during the time-span that most of the Bible covers, Satan had already lost his name of Lucifer.
Yet you believe that Satan was the serpent in the Garden (despite Genesis not saying that), and Revelation is happy to throw out other old names and titles of Satan. But curiously, Lucifer is not one of them.
previously-cited, God-approved article
Pretty sure God isn't approving web articles. Lets keep this grounded in reality.
If they have an agenda, it is the the polar opposite of yours: theirs is to declare the truth of God accurately
If you do a little reading on the history of the King James Bible, you'd know it was specifically changed to emphasize the episcopal structure of the Church of England and the importance of an ordained clergy. Many verses were changed and there are several outright mistranslations contained within it. This is historical and easily looked up. -
marty-130-840283 — 9 years ago(January 16, 2017 05:14 PM)
Mamu, stop posting here and misleading people with your lies.
When you say something is unbiblical, people might read it and believe it.
To everyone reading this Mamu is wrong, - Satan was created as an Angel by God, who rebelled, was kicked out of Heaven, tempted Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden, and now lives on earth harassing people with his legion of followers (demons)
now THAT is a Biblical answer. Do not listen to incorrect ramblings of Mamu. -
Navaros — 9 years ago(February 01, 2017 09:09 AM)
The OP/thread title is a false premise. There is nothing in this film that says Satan is a woman.
The actress who played him is a woman, but that doesn't mean that the character is a woman.
Satan is not a woman in this film.
"Science creates fictions to explain facts" Gilman -
Destinata — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 05:07 PM)
I didn't read down to all of the answers so maybe someone has already given it, but Gibson took this movie not from the Bible, but from "The Dolorous Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ," by Sr. Anne Catherine Emmerich:
http://www.jesus-passion.com/DOLOROUS_PASSION_OF_OUR_LORD_JESUS_CHRIST.htm
. Where this movie veers sharply from the Bible version, chances are you can find those scenes in that book. Otherwise, they're usually from Gibson's own imagination.
But you're right, brightwhitehorses that is one of the many differences this movie has with the Bible. And yet people insist it's "biblical." Apparently, they don't know the meaning of the word.
When evil is viewed as good, righteousness is viewed as evil.