Trump nominated 2 white men.
-
The Double Cross — 7 years ago(October 12, 2018 03:54 AM)
This kind of blatant disregard for logic is what is required if you want to be left wing.
They're irrational and debating with them is a tiring, circular affair. I gave up being civil with lefties a long time ago. -
MovieManCin2 — 7 years ago(October 12, 2018 01:37 AM)
Yep! Yermom is right! That makes you a Racist and a Sexist! You should be ashamed of yourself!
MAGA! FAFO!
Schrodinger's Cat walks into a bar, and doesn't. Dumbocraps: evil people who celebrate murder. 
-
Platonic_Caveman — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 03:24 AM)
Obama didn't nominate any gay Asian midgets so he still sucked.
There are more gays in this country than Latina women. Why wasn't an openly gay or lesbian nominated? We're long overdue.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy -
ProjectError
— 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 04:41 AM)I think a gay justice would be biased, and rule on whatever benefits gay people, like marriage equality, and forcing businesses to serve gay couples.
They'd have to sit those cases out for conflict of interest.
I am addicted to you; I have tasted your mind, and I cannot forgo its flavor. -
Platonic_Caveman — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 05:08 AM)
Wow, you're a genius. And heterosexuals should sit out anything about heterosexuals and Clarence Thomas should recuse himself if it concerns blacks.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy -
ProjectError
— 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 06:18 AM)Does any case really concern heterosexuals, though? There's never been a case that concerns heterosexual rights specifically. It was already there from day one.
Oh come on, gay justices would rule that it's unconstitutional to wear brown shoes with a black belt.
I am addicted to you; I have tasted your mind, and I cannot forgo its flavor. -
Platonic_Caveman — 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 06:39 AM)
There's plenty of them. Anything dealing with women's rights in relations to their husbands. Or just women's rights in relation to men in general. That's by definition "heterosexual". Anything involving the custody of children.
Dude, your statement was idiotic. You wouldn't have a black judge rule on civil rights. Or a female judge rule on women's rights.
Just admit your statement was lame because I can't be bothered with it.
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy -
ProjectError
— 7 years ago(October 10, 2018 07:21 AM)Clarence Thomas has been biased in favor of pro-black cases where Scalia disagreed. Thomas was the only conservative dissent.
A women judge would more than likely rule on anything favoring women's advancement.
I'm js
I am addicted to you; I have tasted your mind, and I cannot forgo its flavor. -
Platonic_Caveman — 7 years ago(October 11, 2018 01:36 AM)
It has nothing to do with the ability to be a judge though. I'm js.
<<< [do you know what kinda eyes these are?]
Administrator
"filmboards is a bold experiment in free speech and anarchy"
I GameBoy