Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. The one thing I felt was lacking (possible spoilers)

The one thing I felt was lacking (possible spoilers)

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
3 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Bourne Identity


    Hillius — 9 years ago(August 21, 2016 01:49 PM)

    The only thing that I felt this film didn't really do well in describing was why Wombasi was scheduled for termination. It didn't seem as if he was a threat to the CIA until after they tried to kill him and being in exile he probably didn't have too much power anymore. As much as I liked the actor who played Wombasi in other shows he was really difficult to understand in this film. Just wondering if I missed something?
    I like Matt Damon and think his Bourne films are really well done, but I do enjoy watching the Richard Chamberlain version from time to time. In that film it is much clearer why he has amnesia although I feel that film is a bit dryer and not as flashy as the Matt Damon version. I think my favorite part of the Chamberlain film is when he is recovering from his wounds in the beginning and the guy who saved him throws him a hand gun and tells him to break it down which he does just like clockwork. Anyone who enjoyed this film might enjoy seeing that older one too, I would recommend it although the plot is much different.
    The critic has to educate the public; the artist has to educate the critic.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      iLikeMovies22 — 9 years ago(August 24, 2016 04:57 PM)

      From the movie
      He was an irritation before he took powerhe was a problem when he was in power and he's been a disaster for us in exile. He's writing a book about the agency's history in Africa. He's going to name names. It's basically a shakedown. He's demanding the agency's help.
      Someone didn't want Wombosi to write that book. Maybe someone involved with Treadstone.
      I've seen the Chamberlain version. It was a while but I remember not really liking. Book Bourne is a good fighter. But Bourne in the Chamberlain version was not.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Hillius — 9 years ago(August 24, 2016 05:33 PM)

        Thanks, I appreciate the Wombosi clarification. I reread the plot on a different website and I still couldn't quite figure out what his deal was.
        Yeah, Richard Chamberlain isn't for everyone & the film is quite dated. It does lack the lightning fast fight sequences of the Matt Damon franchise, but I thought the plot was a bit meatier and Treadstone a bit cooler than the new films. As a fan of Chamberlain in the Shogun film/mini series as a kid I guess I enjoyed him in that film as well, but I do agree Matt Damon does a good job. I have yet to read the books however.
        The critic has to educate the public; the artist has to educate the critic.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups