Don't have kids unless you can support them…
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — John Q
RoadSideAssistance — 11 years ago(October 18, 2014 09:09 PM)
Sorry but WTF was this beep
Yah I get it, this is America and we all just feel so self entitled rolling around in fat scooters and doing whatever we want, but give me a break.
Majority countries would not have the healthcare possible to treat this kid let alone the infrastructure to even consider it, yet Denzel's character feels he's above the law. What a crock.
Look, you want to keep producing crotch fruit, then you better have the money to support them. If you don't, then be prepared to face the consequences. -
liverpool26 — 11 years ago(October 20, 2014 03:27 PM)
He could care for his son didn't he say he's worked there for 15 or 20 years. Are you saying it's his fault because he can't see the future was he supposed to know that his job would be sent to Mexico and his insurance would change.
Any politician trying to privatise our NHS would be committing political suicide but in US its the opposite it's every man for himself -
tvrblue-1 — 11 years ago(October 31, 2014 07:07 PM)
Oh please. He supported his child. He had insurance. The insurance changed because his hours at work were reduced. His child required an expensive surgery.
People work hard, they do their jobs, and unfortunate circumstances fall upon them. No one can predict the future of ther employment. I guess that means no one should have children since they're at risk for hard times in the future.
Spoken like a spoiled brat. -
koffeenkreame41-1 — 10 years ago(June 27, 2015 04:42 AM)
Oh please. He supported his child. He had insurance. The insurance changed because his hours at work were reduced. His child required an expensive surgery.
People work hard, they do their jobs, and unfortunate circumstances fall upon them. No one can predict the future of ther employment. I guess that means no one should have children since they're at risk for hard times in the future.
Spoken like a spoiled brat.
This.
"I'm the ultimate badass,you do NOT wanna f-ck wit me!"Hudson,Aliens -
Citation_Needed — 11 years ago(January 06, 2015 04:23 PM)
The number 1 responsibility of parents is to be able to support them. Love doesn't pay the bills, and this aint olden times where people could just pull up their boot straps, stick together, and get by.
-
jason-535 — 10 years ago(March 24, 2016 01:21 PM)
So you're pposition is that having children should be reserved for those who, at time of conception, can prove for the rest of their lives that they can financially manage any possible ailment that exists in the entire world, no matter how rare it may be, not to mention any future ailments that we don't even know about yet. Great idea
-
katesgram2000 — 9 years ago(July 04, 2016 12:43 PM)
So only wealthy people are supposed to have kids. Yes that is what it would mean if you could afford to pay for something this catastrophic out of pocket.
Okay let's say that happens. From now on only wealthy people have children-the poor die out. Now tell me-who is going to do the menial labor in this country?who is going to haul your garbage-who is going to drive the truck to deliver your crap,who is going be a teacher???
Smart mouth punk is what you are original poster-you deserve to "pick beep with the chickens". You know what they say about karma-enjoy it when it happens to you -
creatorof2002 — 9 years ago(July 22, 2016 08:51 PM)
Nobody can predict needing very expensive medical care and the human race would go extinct if only wealthy or upper middle class reproduced BUT.
It really Pi$$e$ me off when people who are DIRT POOR and starving themselves or are barely able to feed themselves reproduce. To do so is the height of selfishness.
In the movie Slumdog Millionaire we know who the main villain is, the sicko exploiting and in some cases maiming innocent children but the secondary villain after him is the main character's mother. She had no business reproducing KNOWING her child would have a miserable life that he only escaped because of a fluke of good luck.
All over the world impoverished people keep having children and it is so selfish. It is inhumane to sentence a child to be raised by people with no money and no ability to feed them and those people by having children are sentencing their own children to be raised by impoverished people.
The world would be a better place if the lowest of the low stopped reproducing.
Now REGULAR POOR I am fine with but even then BE REASONABLE. One or 2 kids maybe but a poor person should not have several.