She was supposed to be TOPLESS, Jim!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Angel Eyes
Howlin Wolf — 21 years ago(August 01, 2004 04:33 AM)
Faith or no faith, how could you be so CRUEL as to deprive the majority of the male population???!
"Next time someone offers you a penny for your thoughts, sell " -
MoonsofJupiter — 21 years ago(November 04, 2004 11:07 AM)
Hey, Howling Wolf, there are approximately a thousand zillion pictures of nude women in the world. If Jim Caviezel preferred to work without having his co-star naked that's his business. Surely you can console yourself somewhere else.
-
Howlin Wolf — 21 years ago(November 06, 2004 01:31 PM)
I was merely remarking that given the choice between breasts 'visible' or 'obscured', I'm sure neither I nor most of my sex would stray far from the 'red-blooded' option!
Follow your destiny; accept it, no matter where it leads you. -
MoonsofJupiter — 21 years ago(November 06, 2004 02:13 PM)
Yes, yes, I understand. What we have to do is look at it from Jim Caviezel's perspective. He's a religious guy and he prefers his co-stars, however attractive they may be, covered up. And he's the one who has to do the love scene. Do you know how many women would have liked to get a good look at Jim? But, hey, that's life.
-
allisonarf — 17 years ago(February 17, 2009 06:59 PM)
He refused to strip for a love scene with Ashley Judd in High Crimes. I would have liked to have seen him naked myself, but he doesn't want to get naked with anyone but his wife. I respect that. You know how many actors leave their spouses for their co-stars? At least he's not as bad as Kirk Cameron, who won't even kiss his co-stars.