6.7??

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Hannibal

---

graulaw — 11 years ago(June 27, 2014 03:41 PM)

It amazed me just how low this work of art is appreciated.

[fgadmin]

KDBoa — 11 years ago(July 14, 2014 08:52 AM)

Agreed.
However, I remember being disappointed when I first saw this at the cinemas. A year or so later i read the book then went back and saw the film again. What Scott has done here is amazing. I wish the subplot of the other serial killer in the art gallery was given a bit more attention.
I'm thinking of getting it on blu-ray. Just checking what different versions are out there

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

KDBoa — 11 years ago(July 15, 2014 02:17 AM)

Thanks for the heads up

[fgadmin]

Dark_Phoenix89 — 11 years ago(January 15, 2015 06:10 PM)

Agreed; Its a solid 8/10 from me
"Speak of the Devil, and He shall appear."

[fgadmin]

IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

[fgadmin]

shawnz1028 — 11 years ago(April 03, 2015 08:17 PM)

It was a solid followup to Lambs, but I'd still only give it a 7/10, which isn't all that much higher than 6.7. Still, it makes my personal top-250.

[fgadmin]

britten_mark — 9 years ago(August 25, 2016 05:06 PM)

A 9 from me, only marred sligtly by some occasinal kitsch camera work and over used bookmarks, like the cuts to news footage of the latest current events, which I doubt would happen on a secretive investigation anyway.
"Well, let's not start suckin' each others dicks just yet"

[fgadmin]

yusef-ghanima — 10 years ago(April 07, 2015 03:28 PM)

before or after your brain white trash meal?
i mostly will not be able to answer your reply, since marissa mayer hacked my email, no notification