AKA
-
alkamal_r — 19 years ago(January 31, 2007 06:11 PM)
Yeah, thats the dumbest thing about imdb, the stupid AKA's. Like we really need a list of all the years. I'm surprised this hasn't been corrected yet, it makes the filmography look so silly.
Ironically, this isn't even ironic at all. -
VanBurenPhilips — 18 years ago(April 10, 2007 05:18 AM)
In 1975, no one died.
In 1976, no one died.
In 1977, no one died.
In 1978, no one died.
In 1979, no one died.
In 1980 someone died.
In 1981, no one died.
In 1982 there was the incident with the pigeon.
In 1983, no one died.
In 1984, no one died.
In 1985, no one died.
In 1986 I mean, I could go on. -
jonnyc_uk — 18 years ago(November 20, 2007 05:41 AM)
hahah steve coogan
http://www.myspace.com/jonnycollison -
Takenu — 18 years ago(May 13, 2007 02:09 PM)
Mathematicians have developed a most brilliant solution to long sequences. It's the dot-dot-dot or symbol and it would reduce the huge list to
Film '72 (UK)
Film '73 (UK) (new title)
()
Film 2007 (UK) (new title)
which obviously looks a lot better. Maybe someone should sue IMDB for causing RSI by forcing us to scroll down pointless listings that don't interest us. Although they most likely made sure they can't be sued for such things. Either way, this is quite improfessional. Maybe some people ought to take a few lessons on structured information display. -
dave-2671 — 18 years ago(October 28, 2007 06:04 PM)
I agree. This drives me nuts. Every time I see it at someone's IMDb page filmography, I have to scroll way down to get to the next thing. It's so ridiculous. If someone appears on this show for one freaking episode, it conquers half the space of their IMDb filmography. Either IMDb needs to do something about this, or else people need to start refusing to appear on this damn show for the sake of preserving an aesthetically pleasing filmography!