Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Goof *major spoilers*

Goof *major spoilers*

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
6 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Urban Legends: Final Cut


    brocky158 — 21 years ago(February 02, 2005 12:43 PM)

    In the scene where Professor Solomon reveals himself as the killer and says he is trying to frame Amy, he says he needs her prints on his gun to proove that she killed "TRAVIS" & Toby. Now in the beginning Travis is supposed to have killed himself, usually when you kill yourself you don't have time to hide the weapon, but I could be wrong (sarcasm) why was no one suspicious of there not being a gun when Travis killed himself? Did anyone notice this goof or was it just me!
    That's So Chino!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        brocky158 — 21 years ago(February 03, 2005 08:43 PM)

        That just means that the cops were dumb, how could they not have noticed that there was no gun!
        That's So Chino!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Dupe_of_URL — 21 years ago(March 03, 2005 05:07 AM)

          They were part of the cover-up! After all, the gumm'mint and everyone ELSE is in on the conspriacy. {Please adjust your tin-foil hat now.}
          S'posin' the prof had pulled it off, gone to H-wood and made a movie. A bad movie, a clinker, an Ishtar or a Gigli. Other than getting gigs directing movies for SciFi Channel, so what?? THAT's the career he killed he would kill 8 people for?? AND, if he was sucha no-talent hack he had to teach movie making, how come he was tied int eh "prestigigous Hitchcock Award" voting back when HE was a student??
          Set dis-belief levels to HIGH for viewing this movie.
          Worst is that "they" couldn't come up w/ a shower scene or something for Eva Mendes. Wasting her talents.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            iceskater47 — 18 years ago(July 17, 2007 03:30 AM)

            i noticed that too. it was pretty crap - then again the whole movie was crap

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              bballfreakkg21 — 15 years ago(December 23, 2010 12:52 AM)

              Yea not only that but also the fact that if he wanted to frame her for two murders, why would he stalk her and attempt to kill her earlier in the film?
              haha gotta love slashers

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups