And More Plagiarism. . . .
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The View
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 04:44 PM)
Seriously, are we watching a bad comedy? First Melania, now Trump's pick for a national security communications advisor:
http://money.cnn.com/interactive/news/kfile-trump-monica-crowley-plagiarized-multiple-sources-2012-book/ -
pjpurple-1 — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 07:57 PM)
Oh goody, more news about more evil Republicans. This sort of thing NEVER happens when Democrats are in power.
But I am sure all this negative stuff keeps Hester from jumping off a bridge! So it serves its purpose.
But any book that points out the folly of Keynesian economics and the brilliance of Dr. Milton Friedman is worth it. Facts are facts. How does one "plagiarize" the truth? Was Monica Crowley supposed to manufacture her own new facts to make Hester happy? Of course nothing short of all Republicans and conservatives spontaneously combusting and aliens abducting the entire Trump family would put a smile on her face and hope back in her heart.
Facts are not liberals strong suit. Rhetoric is. Thomas Sowell -
A_l_a_c_h_u_a_1 — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 05:22 AM)
more news about more evil Republicans
I wonder if Crawley's famous liberal brother-in-law is aware of Crawley's "plagiarism". Especially since they work closely together on FNC and often hang out with one another. -
!!!deleted!!! (28128673) — 9 years ago(January 07, 2017 08:58 PM)
And yet MORE plagiarism!
Crowley was also caught plagiarizing in the 1990s. This woman is shameless and really sets the tone for lack of morality in the Trump administration. How many other pieces of her writing will found to be plagiarized? Journalists are now going over them with a fine comb.
From Slate: This is not the first time Crowley has been called out for her seeming fondness to lift other peoples work. In a 1999 piece for Slate, Timothy Noah wrote about how a Wall Street Journal column by Crowley strongly resembled a 1988 article in Commentary. At the time the Journal ran an editors note: Had we known of the parallels, we would not have published the article.