Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. How does Taggart suspect Randy Travis– possible spoiler

How does Taggart suspect Randy Travis– possible spoiler

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
14 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Fire Down Below


    DemonicHeart — 21 years ago(February 11, 2005 07:50 PM)

    I watched this movie several times and I can't figure out how Taggart suspects Travis is dirty. Here's what I saw.
    Sarah gets in car with crooked agents. Taggart looks over at them. Agents take off. Taggart chases them. I mean, the movie shows absolutely nothing that convinces us that the agents are dirty other than Taggart giving chase. Any ideas?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      beardouk — 21 years ago(February 13, 2005 07:32 AM)

      As the agents are about to drive off, Taggart sees the bald guy turn and look back - there is a brief flash of the same guy in another car - implying taht Taggart has seen him before.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        FireJake41 — 21 years ago(February 17, 2005 11:13 PM)

        I think that the look back to him was suspicious and he was just going to talk to them again when they peeled outthinking he was on to them.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          IMDb User

          This message has been deleted.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            nocrud222 — 21 years ago(March 08, 2005 09:38 PM)

            1. Taggart saw one of the agents looking back at him as if to make sure he was not following him. This was suspicious to Taggart. However, #2 seemed to confirm it to Taggart when,
            2. The car with the woman gong to the witness protection program safe house suddenly accelerated where there was no need to do so. And,
            3. The man commented to the woman that she could contact him anytime she wanted which is not what a witness is allowed to do. This further indicated that they were more eager to get her and hurry her away.
              Note that Taggart did nothing but try to stop them as if to make sure they were what they said they were. When they suddenly started to run, he knew he had to follow them. I also wonder if there was not some kind of communication in the story between Taggart and the man looking at him from the back of the car and this segment did not make it into the movie. This makes me want to go back and do a little more examination of the story to see what actually happened.
              These are my best guesses for the moment.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              bolledeigen — 20 years ago(April 17, 2005 01:46 PM)

              Hah, anyone of you understood how Taggart knew Earl's entire life history? I think perhaps Steven Seagal has some kind of magical powers 😕

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                laco001 — 20 years ago(July 21, 2005 11:43 PM)

                You are absolutely right. That is the real mystery.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  brettmajors_karaokeking — 20 years ago(July 30, 2005 01:40 AM)

                  I just thought of this, Taggart asks Travis "Isn't it unusual for a federal agent to have a quick draw ring?" That on top of them looking back several times and speeding off indeed tipped him off.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    tracy_shane — 19 years ago(April 20, 2006 11:12 AM)

                    it was in the script lol

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      brettmajors_karaokeking — 20 years ago(July 30, 2005 01:35 AM)

                      I think if you watch carefully, Taggart notices something is wrong when they speed off. Why the heck would any agent do that? My father was a U.S. Marshall and back in '97 we watched it together. He knew that Travis' character was dirty before they sped off. I guess agents have a sixth-sense or something. Either way, this was a great action flick. And as in other action flicks, did anyone expect the story to be concrete?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        mrham1 — 20 years ago(September 14, 2005 04:11 AM)

                        WOW this is so easy, its plain as day. Tagert put 2 and 2 together when he realized the ageny played my Randy Travis didnt have an official issue fire arm. How can any of you be oblivious to this?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          nd1433 — 20 years ago(February 07, 2006 03:16 AM)

                          Two things made him suspect Travis character. The first was him having a quick draw rig, like he said "that's unusual for a federal agent". Also when they put Sarah in the car, most agents would have put the witness or a suspect in the back of the car, not in the front of the car. Hence Segal looking at the balding guy in the back seat looking around. Standard procedure would have been for the two agents to be in front, witness in the back.
                          heal the pastlive for the present dream of the future

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            jhromero04 — 19 years ago(April 23, 2006 08:38 PM)

                            Yeah, I pretty much think when the federal agent looked back at Taggart, Taggart became suspicious and then a second later they speeded off and he knew something was wrong. This movie made me laugh a bit. I mean I can see Seagal as a cop knowing aikido and as a Navy Seal that knows aikido, but an EPA agent that knows aikido? I mean, c'mon. But still even with that corniness, I kind of thought that Seagal was at his best (or at least his most awesome) in this movie. For some reason, I thought Seagal was awesome in this movie, even more awesome than in like Under Siege, Hard To Kill, Out For Justice, which are obviously his best movies. His best movies are far better than this movie, but Seagal was really awesome in this movie. Still, this movie was a hell of a lot better than a lot of his recent efforts, even though I hear that Mercenary For Justice, Seagals most recent movie, is pretty good.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              nutsberryfarm — 13 years ago(May 11, 2012 08:48 AM)

                              yes he put 2 and 2 together and got 8.
                              Can't go wrong with taupe."- Wynn Duffy

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0

                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups