Don't get me wrong, I thought SL was good too, but Amistad was just more emotionally effecting to me. Also it was better
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Amistad
mackhardy5 — 18 years ago(June 28, 2007 06:13 PM)
Don't get me wrong, I thought SL was good too, but Amistad was just more emotionally effecting to me. Also it was better written and better acted in a few key spots. But for some reason it gets no respect while SL is freaking #6 on IMDB, which is definitely doesn't deserve, and Amistad is barely at a 7.0! What gives?
-
pbl1 — 17 years ago(May 17, 2008 09:19 AM)
we will change the ranking at once, since, obviously, your opinion should carry more weight than the overall voting public.
Schindler's List was a masterpiece. By comparison, Amistad was an Afterschool Special.
What the $%*& is a Chinese Downhill?!? -
bertrambunter — 17 years ago(May 24, 2008 11:04 PM)
IMHO, they are both immensely important and affecting pieces of work - each in its own way very special and inspirational - and kudos to S Spielberg for his guiding hand in both. Does it have to be a competition? Wouldn't you say we are just plain lucky to have both?
-
DreTam2000 — 15 years ago(September 05, 2010 04:02 AM)
Wouldn't you say we are just plain lucky to have both?
Yes, I would say that we are quite lucky to have both, however I agree with the OP. This film is criminally underrated while SL gets far more attention. Both films are directed intricately and with elaborate dramatic detail. Beautifully tragic and magical, I am moved and equally disgusted by both.
I think what a poster or two said further down the board is true. The film raises issues and memories that many American viewers are not comfortable with. How amazing is it that such an important piece of cinema can be glossed over it because of folks' discomfort with truth.
I'm not a control freak, I just like things my way -
bryanac625 — 17 years ago(June 08, 2008 03:07 PM)
I agree with you on this one, simply because I am more of a student of American history than I am of the Holocaust or European history. I think the movie was a great drama, although I don't believe it to be very accurate.
I think for many Americans, it is hard to embrace movies about slavery, segregation and the Civil Rights movement. There are a lot of good films made on African-American heritage but I think because these movies bring up a lot of pain for blacks and guilt for whites, they get overlooked again and again. I wonder how big
Schindler's List
was in Europe? -
cythna — 15 years ago(January 19, 2011 06:03 PM)
I agree, I think it's better. However all the political manoeuverings aren't going to be so popular as Schindler's list's story of one man saving hundreds. Amistad is a film that has improved for me over viewings. I've seen it 3 times, and each time I've been more impressed by it.
-
sarizonana — 13 years ago(November 02, 2012 10:07 AM)
i think both films are equally great.
i agree Amistad is avery underrated film but that doesnt make it better than Schindlers list.
someone here said that many people is more interested in schindlers story because its about a men who saved hundreads but Amistad did the same thing.
here Mr Baldwing is the equal to Schindler.
both starated with a similar motive which their was self interest
Schindler at the beginning started doing for money meanwhile Baldwing started helping because he wanted to become famous and get prestige as lawyer.
at the end both got attached to the people they were saving and changed their motives for what they were doing .