5.6? WAY to low!
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Tremors II: Aftershocks
Dwright1212 — 15 years ago(June 08, 2010 11:29 PM)
This is a great movie and I'll go as far as saying that it is one of the best sequals of all time! This movie deserves atleast a 7.5 (the first movie deserves a 8.5). I know five years ago, this movie had a 5.1, and I know the rating has gone up five points, but it must be said: bring the rating up! Who agrees?
Armed and Dangerous
~Tremors~
http://www.tremors3movie.com/ -
TheSonomaDude — 15 years ago(January 05, 2011 09:36 PM)
I agree 100%. Actually, I like all them, and I think they all need higher ratings, but expessially this one. But it's going up! Now it's a 5.7! Yahhhy!
Yah I remember when this had a 5.1, and it was rated lower than Tremors 3! Like, WTF?
I have El Sonoma del Torra de Fiero Syndrome. Be happy you don't.
Trust me. -
brodiebruce_405 — 14 years ago(May 21, 2011 06:37 PM)
Was rated lower than Tremors 3 because less people saw that one and they were all Tremors die hard fans. Tremors 2 has low ratings from all those idiots who wanted Kevin Bacon and didn't get it, so therefore the movie must be bad.
Personally, I think 2 is the best in the series. I can't find a line as funny as "If you wanna hunt graboids, you better know geology. Now you drive while I keep my eye on this seismojigger" in ANY of the other films, which were all good to fine. -
BudrodaHooligan — 14 years ago(June 04, 2011 12:25 AM)
With a budget of 4 million dollars, 2 actors of the previous cast, 2 different types of monsters and 2 giant explosions with a nice shockwave, this is a fantastic production and very enjoyable
"If he tries to add something to the script, Superman will be in danger." - DonkeyKongKing