OK movie but not worth 7.7

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Dead Man

---

ToddHere — 13 years ago(May 10, 2012 01:21 PM)

This movie is watchable if you have patience, but it's definitely not worth the current rating of 7.7. I give it a 5 (at best).

[fgadmin]

jnathan — 10 years ago(November 18, 2015 12:49 AM)

For those of us who are blessed with the virtue of patience, it is easily worth that. I give it a 9.
My vote history:
http://us.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=9354248

[fgadmin]

lubin-freddy — 9 years ago(June 09, 2016 09:57 PM)

11
"What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence."

[fgadmin]

exaybachay84 — 9 years ago(August 23, 2016 07:40 AM)

I, for one, love slow-paced movies. And a slow-paced movie with an ensemble cast, directed by Jim Jarmusch, scored by Neil Young and filled with some humour and metaphysical overtones deserves 10/10 in my book. Actually, having seen it about 20 times, it's currently my favourite film of all time. And I saw it almost 20 years ago for the first time!
Do you have any tobacco?

[fgadmin]

Gobobo — 9 years ago(December 08, 2016 05:34 AM)

I saw it for the first time last night and give it a solid 8. The weirdest western I've seen, cameos galore, loads of metaphors, great performances all round, very funny and I love it when I stick an unknown film on and am surprised by the quirkiness.
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.

[fgadmin]

TAFFman — 3 months ago(December 15, 2025 04:44 AM)

If being a weird western is a good thing to you, you should watch 'Greaser's Palace' (1972), directed by Robert Downey Sr. (I love it.)