Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Macaulay's dead-pan delivery

Macaulay's dead-pan delivery

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
10 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Good Son


    caitlynkeefer — 11 years ago(February 25, 2015 05:04 AM)

    Is it just me or did anyone else notice this? It seemed like in almost every single line, Macaulay is just dead-panning it; same mono-tone with zero dramatic or suspenseful effect whatsoever. Now I know this was more than likely intentionally to make him seem more "creepy".and it works at some parts. But others, I get the vibe he's just reading straight from the script. Maybe I'm just picky, but yeah, that annoys me. Other than that, good movie though!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Mysti80 — 11 years ago(March 31, 2015 01:32 PM)

      I do see that too and agree with you here.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Royalcourtier — 10 years ago(August 05, 2015 10:29 PM)

        Macaulay cannot act. That is the obvious explanation

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          jsn_hylnd — 9 years ago(September 08, 2016 10:02 PM)

          He acted very well in this, very convincing snot, he acted good in Home ALone 1 and 2. You're debunked.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              EHiggins51 — 10 years ago(September 01, 2015 11:09 AM)

              I agree. I understand he was a crazy kid and wasn't supposed to show much remorse or emotion, but there's a way to do that without sounding like you're just reading off a piece of paper. Especially the scene where Mark thinks Henry poisoned the food in the fridge: "Go on, Mark. Get something to eat. What are you waiting for? Oh. I see. You think I'm trying to poison my family."
              But year, overall a decent movie.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                AmyJolamb — 10 years ago(September 24, 2015 10:13 AM)

                That's how the character is. Emotionless. Except when he kills or causes accidents. Typical serial killer ways.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  cool-smith — 9 years ago(April 05, 2016 06:55 PM)

                  thats absurd he scared the beep out of me which means he acted well

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    IMDb User

                    This message has been deleted.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      RynoII — 9 years ago(October 10, 2016 10:00 PM)

                      I too agree that Culkin did not do a convincing job. I feel that he was stuntcasted in this, and that the filmmakers only got him cause he was a child hit at the time, without regards if he was the best in the part or not.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0

                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups