SPOILER! The absurdities that ruin 'Shattered'
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Shattered
FilmNoirOnline — 18 years ago(April 17, 2007 06:49 PM)
For a good part of this movie, it simply is a beautiful neo-noir. Casting, location, atmosphere - it's all there. However, I cannot get past the absolutely ridiculous ending that
has us believe that Dan Merrick is actually Jack Stanton. Merrick goes back to work, goes to see Jenny, the interaction with Klein, all of this and NOBODY seems to notice that "Dan Merrick" has a different voice. A different personality. Different mannerisms. On and on and on. The writer(s)/director thought that by just changing the FACE, they could pull off a believable thriller. No way. It ruined the entire movie and is one of those that implies the audience must be brain dead to fall for all of that. Just a little bit of thought - and you realize you have been HAD. First 1/2 of the movie is an A. The second half (and especially the last quarter): F -
wswofsey — 18 years ago(April 19, 2007 05:06 PM)
I have to agree with you. I recall seeing this years ago & everyone saying "What a great twist at the end". I thought it made no sense & while a clever idea, it was unbelievable. The same thoughts crossed my mindNo one notices his voice is different. Were they the same exact height? Did they smell exactly the same? I didn't buy any of it.
-
Minuet888 — 13 years ago(December 23, 2012 06:58 PM)
I just added it to the goofs section,plastic surgeons if needing to go off of a photo alone use bone structure first to guide them and no two people (unless identical twins) have the same facial bone structure, and the plastic surgeons would have been able to tell this immeidately.
ALSO with that musch blood loss the guy would have needed a blood transfusion so who is to tell they didn't have the same blood type. The bone structure thing alone blows their hole plot right out of the water. -
oprlvr-1 — 18 years ago(June 04, 2007 09:51 PM)
Actually, the flashback scene is from the party Jack was attending that same evening. That's where he was when Judith calls him and he rushes to her home. I agree the film is a decent idea that turns absurb. I also thought, with the exception of Bob Hoskins, that the actors were not at their best.
-
jillsman888 — 18 years ago(June 06, 2007 08:15 AM)
You are so right! Bob Hoskins did a great job and I felt him believable all the way through. BUT.I was confused about when the wife had killed the partner's wife and THOUGHt she had killed the detective and said that THEY (the ones she killed) were the only OTHER people who knew Jack's true identity. I can't believe that his BUSINESS partner didn't figure out that he wasn't the same person as before especially when he wasn't very good at 'his' job anymore after the accident. And even if he did LOOK the same, wouldn't his voice be different? Can't believe NOBODY else in the movie figured out something wasn't right
-
sadscaryguy — 18 years ago(June 10, 2007 03:31 PM)
Well you guys obviously know thats tom berengers real voice there is no voice change in the movie because back then they didnt have the whole cgi change voice dub thing
it worked either way for me the movie the end was kind of funny -
RJ-Flethcer — 18 years ago(June 19, 2007 04:04 PM)
That's true because both parts "parts" were being played by the same actor, but I think the argument being made above is that since we're to believe Tom Berenger is playing 2 different men, each should have his own voice. The fact that they have the same voice is the flaw that is being pointed out.
-
starwalker_az — 18 years ago(July 03, 2007 02:17 AM)
Another thing that sort of spoiled it involved Bob Hoskins. He did a fantastic job as Gus Klien, but the idea that his asthma inhaler would allow him to survive being submerged is ridiculous. I use two inhalers for COPD, and the metered spray will not provide breathing support if underwater.
You can't fix stupid - Ron White -
TrumpIsAHump — 13 years ago(February 23, 2013 08:21 AM)
No, both parts weren't being played by the same actor. Check the cast listing. Scott Getlin played Jack Stanton. I haven't seen the movie in years, but most likely, they had Tom Berenger dub Scott Getlin's lines so that the voices would sound the same.
-
BoSoxRule — 12 years ago(December 14, 2013 03:05 PM)
"I haven't seen the movie in years, but most likely, they had Tom Berenger dub Scott Getlin's lines so that the voices would sound the same."
That's exactly what they did. When Stanton is talking to Judith in the car after she kills Dan, he clearly has Berenger's voice.
I'm happiestin the saddle. -
DalcassianKnight — 17 years ago(November 03, 2008 11:16 AM)
I thought this was a great movie and well acted. Many of your points here are excellent points but all of them can be logically explained.
First, the obvious.
Blood type Unless the detective and his business partner each took a bllod sample, I doubt they would have noticed a difference in his blood type.
Voice It's entirely possible and in fact likely, that if he had severe lacerations to his face, he may also have had lacerations to his neck and upper torso. After several reconstructive surgeries, he may also have had reconstructive surgery to his throat and larynx which would probably change his voice. Unless somebody is a real jerk, nobody would be so insensitive enough to point it out to him.
Mannerisms having come so close to death and enduring dozens of reconstructive surgeries, having amnesia, it's likely that a person might act a little differently. They might be a little unfamiliar, even towards people who have known them for years. The person may be very meek and mild when they realize they were clinging to life by a straw.
So, although these are all very good points you bring up, it is possible that people noticed his different voice and mannerisms but were just to polite to mention it. -
starwalker_az — 18 years ago(July 03, 2007 02:13 AM)
Not only are his voice and mannerisms different, but he would have no idea how to be an architect. Then you have fingerprints. What about blood type, it would be a stretch of the imagination to believe the husband and lover both had the same blood type.
You can't fix stupid - Ron White -
abchulett — 18 years ago(January 27, 2008 07:30 PM)
<
Suspension of disbelief is one thing. Expecting us to be complete idiots is another; it's called "having no respect for the intelligence of the audience." I was shocked at how bad the movie is at the start; the first 15 minutes is howlingly awful, but then it hooked me for its next hour or so. By then I knew what the ending was likely to be, and I was right, and that was ridiculous too. I won't go into ALL of the spoilers, but how about these: NOBODY could survive that kind of a crash without seat belts and air bags; NOBODY could have repaired his face and body to near perfection; NOBODY could buy the fact that she would go to all that trouble to cover the tracks of someone who was leaving her, especially not knowing that he would have amnesia.
Ugh. Hoskins is SO GOOD in this movie that it almost makes their bungling of the story worse. 3/10. Yikes. -
beauedson — 15 years ago(March 05, 2011 10:46 PM)
the op's post is completely retarded, yours only mostly so. you make one legitimate critique:
"NOBODY could buy the fact that she would go to all that trouble to cover the tracks of someone who was leaving her, especially not knowing that he would have amnesia" (mainly the last part)
this is all that matters because his wife is the only character still in the movie (other than hoskins at the very end w/the rescue) after the doppelganger reveal and the doppelganger switch recognition. he has like two scenes with her, so it's natural for the viewer to ask 'well why would she do it if she didn't know he had amnesia'.
the plausibility of surviving the crash, voice and mannerisms change, degree of precision of plastic surgery - all are totally irrelevant at that point in the movie. it's doppelganger reveal, recognition of doppelganger switch, about two scenes with wife(*), movie over. they do the twist, and they get out fast, and that makes all that other nonsense mentioned by you slothturds matter not.- here, again, viewer questions as to her motives and reasoning should arise
