Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Almost a Sequel to 'The Quiet Man?'

Almost a Sequel to 'The Quiet Man?'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
6 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Only the Lonely


    tomlasusa-1 — 16 years ago(March 19, 2010 09:11 AM)

    I just read an article that says that "Only The Lonely" was originally supposed to be a psuedo-sequel to wonderful John Wayne/Maureen O'Hara film "The Quiet Man."
    Logically, O'Hara would have played the older Mary-Kate Danneher/Thorton I imagine Wayne's character of Sean Thorton would be deceased.
    I wonder why they didn't go that route?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Quintpalm2 — 15 years ago(July 07, 2010 06:31 PM)

      Who cares?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        AJSeven — 15 years ago(August 05, 2010 08:03 PM)

        Quintpalm2 ladies and gentlemen, a real douchebag.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Quintpalm2 — 15 years ago(August 05, 2010 08:49 PM)

          Thank you, AJSeven. You're a real class act. By the way, that was sarcasm in case you didn't readily identify it as such.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            jaystarstar — 12 years ago(October 11, 2013 10:35 PM)

            To get back to the original post, I don't think so.
            Rose is much more snippy and shrewish than Mary-Kate ever was.
            I suspect they decided not to make any overt connections, because if they did, they would have to pay script royalties to the writers of 'The Quiet Man' (or their estates) for using the characters.
            They certainly COULD have done it if they wanted to there's no reason 'Rose Muldoon' couldn't have been named 'Mary-Kate Thornton,' with a picture of the Duke on the living room mantel, etc etc.
            But again it probably mainly came down to money, plus it made no sense as a 'sequel' other than the Maureen O'Hara characters would have the same name and act somewhat similar.

            1. You ever seen Superman $#$# his pants? Case closed.
            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              cmashieldscapting — 10 years ago(August 19, 2015 09:54 PM)

              People would accuse Mary Kate of being unfaithful to Sean because really John Wayne as John Candy's father? No way!!!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              • Login

              • Don't have an account? Register

              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Groups