Most men are pretty useless and a lot of them sort of get written off by society anyway. Would it be more efficient and
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Politics
insurgent — 3 years ago(August 11, 2022 02:04 PM)
Most men are pretty useless and a lot of them sort of get written off by society anyway. Would it be more efficient and even more compassionate to have fewer men?
You don't need a 50/50 split to keep the population going. As AI advances, we won't need them for physical labor jobs soon either. I think a goal of 5% male, 95% female, with some organization to prevent inbreeding, would be ideal.
The only question is what would we do with all the unnecessary males? -
insurgent — 3 years ago(August 11, 2022 02:39 PM)
I'm on the fence with this one. Boys are fine until they hit puberty, then they transform into monsters. So although I understand the benefits of ending their life before they get to that point, I still see children as fairly innocent.
-
/. — 3 years ago(August 11, 2022 02:21 PM)
But with less men and their massive brains to go around then AI advancement would slow to a crawl and this world you envision wouldn't be possible. A fatal flaw in your logic, but we can forgive you since you are a woman.
My password is password -