Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Navarre's SWORD . . .

Navarre's SWORD . . .

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
3 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Ladyhawke


    MC1-Bjornson — 11 years ago(January 22, 2015 03:15 PM)

    Navarre (Rutger Hauer) is told that his family sword was lost while crossing the river in the night. Later in the picture, Philipe (Matthew Broderick) removes a sword from underneath a carriage and provides it to Navarre in the cathedral to confront the bishop. The sword appears to be Navarre's five generational sword.
    I think the film's narrative on the sword was vague, unless I missed something somewhere. Is that the family sword at the end of "Ladyhawke" (1985)? Had it been lost than recovered? Was it ever lost at all? Did Philipe lie to Navarre and actually have the family sword the whole time? Thoughts?
    Thanks,
    ~ MC1
    The reservist formerly known as JO2

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      etiennestories — 11 years ago(February 23, 2015 05:23 PM)

      The movie made it quite clear: the boy thief and the monk conspired to hide the sword.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Seymour-Pats — 10 years ago(August 22, 2015 07:26 AM)

        Yeah, I agree. I thought this was totally clear in the film. Philippe and Imperius hid the sword because Navarre had intended to use the sword to fulfill his family quest by killing the Bishop - and Philippe and Imperious thought if they hid the sword they might be able to talk some sense into him.
        I got this the first time I saw the movie and I was about 6. It wasn't confusing in the slightest.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups