Of course it can and needs to be performed for medical reasons, like phimosis, but the US medical establishment propagat
-
Cheeky — 1 year ago(June 10, 2024 08:49 PM)
I don't get it either
I guess they think it's easier to keep clean, but the uncut men I know don't have a problem with that
If we take the time to see with the heart and not with the mind, we shall see that we are surrounded completely by angels ~ Carlos Santana -
Pandora — 1 year ago(June 11, 2024 06:46 AM)
I think the cleanliness thing is peddled as a justification for the procedure. I couldn't even say whether I have been with a circumcised man or not because a cock is just a cock to me and I have never needed to concern myself with the foreskin or no foreskin aspect. Also, I have never noticed an issue with the cleanliness of it.
-
ToastedCheese — 1 year ago(June 12, 2024 08:22 AM)
I think the cleanliness thing is peddled as a justification for the procedure
Yup! Any man with any self-awareness would know this. And how dirty is a dick compared to a vagina?
Uncut cocks are part of the whole. That is package the male comes with. While its removal might not be a major issue, unless it is a medical issue, there is no reason to try and fix what's not broken.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
Pandora — 1 year ago(June 12, 2024 10:15 AM)
Which goes back to my original point being that surely the foreskin is there for a very important reason - ie. protect the sensitive head. It's a little bit of bodily armour and has a purpose. Hacking it off just seems really bizarre.
