On a Scale from 1 (which is "Terrible") to 10 (which is "Great"), How would you Rate the 1983 Movie "
-
Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Christine
AnthonyRocks — 3 years ago(June 01, 2022 05:37 AM)
On a Scale from 1 (which is "Terrible") to 10 (which is "Great"), How would you Rate the 1983 Movie "
CHRISTINE
" in every capacity, manner, way, shape, and form ?
10 - Great
0%
0 votes
9
0%
0 votes
8
0%
0 votes
7
0%
0 votes
6
0%
0 votes
5
0%
0 votes
4
0%
0 votes
3
0%
0 votes
2
0%
0 votes
1 - Terrible
0%
0 votes
I Don't Know
0%
0 votes
I Have Never Seen it
0%
0 votes -
ToastedCheese — 3 years ago(June 01, 2022 08:42 AM)
I feel
The Dead Zone
is missing something in representation. It is great to have Walken and Sheen on board, but compared to the book, which was both intimate and epic, I just find the film was way too rushed.
I enjoy
Firestarter
very much. Pretty much the entire novel was contained within a 110 min feature and I like the cast. The visual effects were top notch for its time, pre-cgi days. I'd love to have Charlie's powers more than Carrie's. She was also TK psychic in a sense and she was just explosive.
Norman! What did you put in my tea? -
I love hutch — 3 years ago(June 01, 2022 08:53 AM)
"The Dead Zone" worked so well for me because of Christopher Walken's performance. Johnny is such a likable person.
"Firestarter" may be a little bit better than I had first claimed. I just looked at the supporting cast. I forgot about Art Carney and Louise Fletcher being in it. I need to see it again probably.
"My life is over. I might as well dance with Johnny Slash!" -
ToastedCheese — 3 years ago(June 01, 2022 08:59 AM)
I have only read
The Dead Zone
once and lately it has been recollected by me as being one of the best King reads I had. Johnny and his gf Sarah were both very likeable characters.
Norman! What did you put in my tea?