Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Clearing up some misconceptions

Clearing up some misconceptions

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
7 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Thing


    BlablaBlackSheep — 3 years ago(December 19, 2022 03:05 AM)

    Too many people spout theories about the movie without understanding the basics.

    1. The Things all know they’re Things. This is shown repeatedly such as when Blair builds the spacecraft and whoever sabotages the blood.
    2. Norris-Thing did not “inherit” any heart condition. Norris-Thing doesn’t have a heart. The inside of its chest cavity is just lined with teeth and filled with tentacles, as shown when it opens up.
    3. The Thing does not “infect” people slowly. The Thing can only forcibly assimilate victims by launching its tentacles at them and violently digesting them to produce a copy.
    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      The Kraken — 3 years ago(December 19, 2022 03:08 AM)

      Thanks for telling us

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        WarrenPeace — 3 years ago(December 19, 2022 03:20 AM)

        It has been awhile since I have seen it…

        1. Did we ever find out which one sabotaged the blood.
          I think Windows was carrying the keys to the blood fridge and dropped them.
          Who picked them up?
          Also, remind me please of how ruining the blood supply helps The Thing?
        2. Then how do you explain Norris Thing having chest problems?
          Heart burn from digesting Human Norris?
          "Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          BlablaBlackSheep — 3 years ago(December 19, 2022 04:14 AM)

          Most likely explanation people go with is that Palmer sabotaged the blood sometime after scooping up the keys when Windows dropped them. Another possibility is that Palmer or Norris-Thing knew where a spare set of keys to the blood bank were. The Thing sabotaged the blood to prevent any further testing that would blow its cover.
          As for Norris-Thing exhibiting chest problems, I think this was all an act in case anyone was watching it. The Thing is a perfect imitation in terms of behaviour and emotion. Mimicking the symptoms a man with coronary disease would only serve to cast away suspicion from it. Perhaps it was practicing in order to fake the heart attack.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            The Kraken — 3 years ago(December 19, 2022 04:19 AM)

            Wow good points. The movie seems scarier now. I think I'll watch it again soon.
            Okay so what's your thoughts about the end? Was Childs a Thing?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              BlablaBlackSheep — 3 years ago(December 19, 2022 07:54 PM)

              I believe Childs wasn’t a Thing. If he was his main goal would have been to freeze itself somewhere in snow and wait for the rescue team to pick it up. Also Childs was still wearing an earring, and The Thing can’t replicate inorganic matter. And if we go by the 2002 videogame sequel which is said to be canon, then Childs did freeze to death while Macready escaped.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                ㅤ/.ㅤ — 1 year ago(October 26, 2024 11:04 PM)

                Agreed, if Childs was, he wouldn't have just sat there.
                Survival was the Thing's priority, not concern for saving humanity.
                My password is a password.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0

                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • Users
                • Groups