Which zombie flick from Italy/Spain is better?

[fgadmin]

Hateful8 — 11 years ago(August 16, 2014 08:27 AM)

Tough call.

[fgadmin]

Boutros_Boutros_Sirhan_Sirhan — 11 years ago(August 29, 2014 09:59 PM)

Oh God, Hell was more hilarious (unintentionally of course), though both were very funny. Nightmare has more of a real plot and was more of a straight horror film and a decent hero. Both films had amazingly stupid leading ladies, and tons of gore (Hell was gorier). The zombies in Hell were so non-threatening at times that the characters had to almost literally throw themselves at them and stand still to make them threatening, at least in nightmare Cit the zombies could run and were smart to a degree.
Both films should be on How Did This Get Made or one of the two MST3K offshoots.

[fgadmin]

Balthazar Bee — 11 years ago(March 04, 2015 06:52 AM)

Nightmare City's no masterpiece, but Nightmare City.
Hell of the Living Dead is so ludicrously awful (and, not for nothing, hilarious) that its very existence seems like some kind of mistake.

[fgadmin]

DeadandBuried81 — 10 years ago(August 14, 2015 12:32 PM)

I prefer Nightmare City, I have the 2 pack of this and without saying both are B movie schlock, Hell of the Living Dead is really frustrating to watch, were NC becomes fun and entertaining.
www.thecultofhorror.blogspot.com

[fgadmin]

Woodyanders — 7 months ago(August 24, 2025 12:43 PM)

I gotta go with Nightmare City on this one.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

[fgadmin]

cryptoflovecraft — 7 months ago(August 25, 2025 12:11 AM)

Hell of the Living Dead
Love 'em both though.