Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. TERRIBLE Acting

TERRIBLE Acting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
50 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Scanners


    violentworld — 22 years ago(February 05, 2004 06:26 PM)

    Are you kidding me?!?! The acting of Stephen Lack as the main character, Cameron Vale, was HORRENDOUS! Like it was just ridiculously bad. I couldn't believe that he was actually such a terrible actor. In fact, my friend and I were so confused as to how he ever got the lead role with such a lack of skill that my friend commented at one point "Wait, is he SUPPOSED to be a bad actor as part of his character?" It's just mindblowing how much of a crappy acting job he did and how he was EVER cast as the main characterWOW

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      IMDb User

      This message has been deleted.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        syvo — 22 years ago(March 01, 2004 01:55 PM)

        I was really glad to see this post. I could not agree with you guys more. I always thought I was alone in recognizing the atrocious acting that saturated this movieI was shocked further to find out that a lot of people actually praise the acting. It made me sick, I couldn't even finish watching the film.
        life's ill

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F Offline
          F Offline
          fgadmin
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          the_man_with_the_plan — 22 years ago(March 15, 2004 04:34 AM)

          Goddamit yes!!
          I saw it for the first time last night, and Ironside was cracking as ever (great gurning), but that Stephen Lack bloke He sounded like he was reading off cue cards!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • F Offline
            F Offline
            fgadmin
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            IMDb User

            This message has been deleted.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • F Offline
              F Offline
              fgadmin
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              DisturbedPixie — 17 years ago(January 24, 2009 10:47 AM)

              I agree with you all. I think this needs to be remade. The effects were more than just poor, comical. Cameron was comical. They were staring at each other for most of the film and it was like that episode of South Park about the psychics vs Cartman. This whole film was a comedy for it's flaws.
              I think the basic plot was interesting enough for this to justify a remake. It could actually be scary.
              If you are Anti-American: Admit you are doing it just to be cool. Does it feel good to hate?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • F Offline
                F Offline
                fgadmin
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                IMDb User

                This message has been deleted.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Offline
                  F Offline
                  fgadmin
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  ClintJCL — 14 years ago(July 14, 2011 09:47 AM)

                  The 2011 remake is gonna be way better than this dated, preposterous movie.
                  Slow. Boring. Slow. Boring. Hardly anything happens.
                  The ridiculous beep idea that if you are telepathic and can access human nervous systems, that you must therefore be able to access computers, because "they have nervous systems too". What utter beep beep
                  The acting when people get scanned. Having to shake and act like "oh no i'm being scanned". The scanner battles. The expressions the actors make. CORNY!
                  The only guns are shotguns you better believe it! Then again, if a scanner may be messing with your aim while you are trying to kill him, a shotgun's wide blast radius might be the only way you still manage to hit them.
                  Yes, a computer can make a telephone booth explode. DEAL WITH IT. Ha ha ha.
                  -ClintJCL
                  http://clintjcl.wordpress.com/category/reviews/
                  http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • F Offline
                    F Offline
                    fgadmin
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    miser42 — 10 years ago(May 05, 2015 11:02 PM)

                    The remake never happened and if this movie was so preposterous, why is it a cult classic?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F Offline
                      F Offline
                      fgadmin
                      wrote last edited by
                      #10

                      ClintJCL — 10 years ago(May 05, 2015 11:50 PM)

                      Since when was being a cult classic and being preposterous mutually exclusive?
                      -ClintJCL
                      http://clintjcl.wordpress.com/category/reviews/
                      http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • F Offline
                        F Offline
                        fgadmin
                        wrote last edited by
                        #11

                        miser42 — 10 years ago(May 06, 2015 12:03 AM)

                        The point is, if you don't like the movie that is your opinion. Your opinion and others are not mutually "inclusive". See what I did there?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • F Offline
                          F Offline
                          fgadmin
                          wrote last edited by
                          #12

                          ClintJCL — 10 years ago(May 06, 2015 12:06 AM)

                          No, not really.
                          You're free to like the movie all you want. I'm glad I watched it, but consider it barely passable badfilm. If I had to watch badfilm, I'd probably want to watch something more ridiculous and lighthearted. This is a bunch of staring, and then shaking your head. Over and over. The acting is terrible. Staring at someone isn't great acting. It's just ridiculous. And not in the good way I just described, haha!
                          -ClintJCL
                          http://clintjcl.wordpress.com/category/reviews/
                          http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F Offline
                            F Offline
                            fgadmin
                            wrote last edited by
                            #13

                            miser42 — 10 years ago(May 06, 2015 12:12 AM)

                            Well I disagree. It is not a bad film. Not in a bad but good way and not in a bad but bad way either. It has loads of atmosphere and presents interesting theories on the idea of telepathy and empaths. Cronenberg chooses to direct his actors in ways that make it unsettling and unnerving for the viewers. Yeah, Stephen Lack isn't the best actor in the world and his role is stiff and disjointed but I believe that is what was needed for the role. How is the films ideas any more ridiculous than say "The Wizard of Oz"?

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • F Offline
                              F Offline
                              fgadmin
                              wrote last edited by
                              #14

                              ClintJCL — 10 years ago(May 06, 2015 12:14 AM)

                              It's generally not, except, well Telepaths being able to read a computer's "mind". Because those are so similar. 😉 I guess they can simply read their car's mind to know if they need to purchase more gasoline.
                              -ClintJCL
                              http://clintjcl.wordpress.com/category/reviews/
                              http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • F Offline
                                F Offline
                                fgadmin
                                wrote last edited by
                                #15

                                miser42 — 10 years ago(May 06, 2015 12:18 AM)

                                It is a science FICTION/ Horror film. Hence, the word fiction. It isn't reality, nor is it supposed to be. It is just supposed to be an interesting story to get lost in for a few hours. Movies are entertainment, you are either entertained or not.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F Offline
                                  F Offline
                                  fgadmin
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #16

                                  ClintJCL — 10 years ago(July 07, 2015 07:01 AM)

                                  What's your point? Are their nonfictional telepaths? No? Then it doesn't matter. We have a concept of what telepathy is. The ability to "Read" a computer's "Mind" (which doesn't actually exist) is nothing at all physically or logically like reading a person's mind. It's not what telepathy is. It's bad writing.
                                  -ClintJCL
                                  http://clintjcl.wordpress.com/category/reviews/
                                  http://www.flickr.com/photos/clintjcl

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • F Offline
                                    F Offline
                                    fgadmin
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #17

                                    IMDb User

                                    This message has been deleted.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      fgadmin
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #18

                                      RobBase086-1 — 15 years ago(April 27, 2010 06:21 PM)

                                      Ironside always plays a very good villian in any movie or TV show to be honest with you. That is why he always gets the bad guy roles in movies or pretty much anything you can think of.
                                      Dedicated to USA UP ALL NIGHT and the fans of the show!
                                      www.deefilmroll.com/usa-uan/

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        fgadmin
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #19

                                        saluk64007 — 14 years ago(July 15, 2011 01:54 PM)

                                        He's not always bad. He was great as a good guy in Starship Troopers, and I'm pretty sure he's been good in a few other things. But yeah he's a great bad guy too.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Offline
                                          F Offline
                                          fgadmin
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #20

                                          RobBase086-1 — 14 years ago(July 15, 2011 03:46 PM)

                                          Well that is where I have seen him mostly play is a bad guy and very seldomly do I see him play a good guy though.
                                          Dedicated to USA UP ALL NIGHT and the fans!
                                          http://www.usaupallnight.webs.com

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0

                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups