Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. One of the best because it 'went there.'

One of the best because it 'went there.'

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
43 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #41

    ZackPickman1983 — 12 years ago(August 05, 2013 07:01 PM)

    Such a scary film. It's all great, but the first half-hour, with Carol Kane trapped in the house, it's really nailbiting.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #42

      Sox575 — 9 years ago(July 16, 2016 05:03 AM)

      I think the issue with horror movies nowadays is that most will follow the formula pattern and the characters do things that we as audience members know they shouldn't be doing (especially when it's been spoofed and described in DETAIL in "Scream") so when we see this happening it ruins the suspension of disbelief. Like in the remake of When A Stranger Calls the baby sitter does
      everything
      you know not to do (like walking around in a dark room and then leaving the security of a locked house to go and check on a guest house where the lights keep going on and off and no one answers the phone), and so the audience no longer buys the whole scenario.
      In the original WASC the viewer doesn't actually see the kids being murdered; we hear about it and get the description and then later
      we see the killer in a flashback in the kids' room covered in blood
      so it's our imaginations that fill in the blank. Same with the original Texas Chainsaw Massacre because a lot of viewers thought it was really gory but it was only the last few minutes that were really bloody; everything else was filled in by the viewer's imagination (which is sometimes scary than actually seeing anything). I myself thought that TCM was really gory until I watched one of the special features on the DVD and it was described how the movie wasn't as gruesome as many thought it was
      , so I watched it again and they were right.
      Engelhaft, I don't know if you've seen the remake of WASC, but if you do, I'd like to know what you think of it. I was cringing and rooting for the killer to get the main character.
      But'Cha Are, Blanche! Ya'Are In That Chair!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        Woodyanders — 4 months ago(November 25, 2025 01:51 AM)

        I give this film extra points for killing the two little kids.
        You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups