Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Apocalyse Now and the Sublime

Apocalyse Now and the Sublime

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
1 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sorcerer


    molypocho — 10 years ago(August 14, 2015 11:19 AM)

    Watched this last night. Not a perfect movie in anyway. Felt like Friedkin wasn't sure how to end it. The expression of the existential quest felt similar to The French Connection (masterpiece!), however, Sorcerer's symbolic South America never fully embeds the film the way New York City's jagged landscape becomes the very existential imbroglio each of us confronts on a daily basis.
    The film's most glaring failure for me was Friedkin's inept handling of his actors. Characters would erupt into passion out of nowhere, and then, a few seconds later, stiffly speak banal, plot-centric lines as though they were automatons reading insurance policies. It feels like Friedkin felt self-conscious about the thin character development and overcompensated by asking his actors to exaggerate their emotions. I wish he would have chosen stoicism over melodrama, and concentrated instead on the story's thematic elements.
    But what I really wanna talk about are the aerial shots of the oil well fire underlined by Tangerine Dream's surreal score: Visionary stuff. I caught a heavy whiff of Coppola's Sublime in Apocalypse Now, a film that follows only two years behind this movie. Anybody else catch that? I'd be willing to bet that Sorcerer was a direct inspiration.
    My rating: 8 (because some of the imagery ain't never gonna stop rattling around in my head)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

    • Login

    • Don't have an account? Register

    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups