just plain AWFUL!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[fgadmin]

Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — King Kong

---

ravnla-55-110542 — 9 years ago(December 07, 2016 08:41 PM)

seemed liked a bad TV movie. gave it a 3. jeesh

[fgadmin]

ConnerysToupee — 9 years ago(December 30, 2016 10:06 PM)

No way. Not perfect, but no where near a 3. A solid 7.5. Very entertaining.
Murdoch: Climb, baby, climb!

[fgadmin]

joker4252 — 9 years ago(December 31, 2016 12:28 AM)

The alter scene is an incredible scene and one of my all time favorites.

[fgadmin]

ConnerysToupee — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 05:44 PM)

Yes, Kong's first appearance is built up VERY well. I actually love this movie until it moves off Skull Island. Same with the '05 version.
Murdoch: Climb, baby, climb!

[fgadmin]

Woodyanders — 8 years ago(November 26, 2017 01:17 PM)

It's flawed, but still pretty good overall. 7 out of 10 from me.
You've seen Guy Standeven in something because the man was in everything.

[fgadmin]

Eric-62-2 — 5 years ago(September 07, 2020 07:03 AM)

The film IMO needs to be judged on its own terms, independent of the 1933 film. On that level it succeeds, whereas Jackson's deliberate attempt to copycat and one-up the 1933 film was just wrong on all levels.