things that you hate seeing in porn movies
-
Agent__Smith — 22 years ago(April 23, 2003 11:39 AM)
Well, I hope that comment of mine doesn't get my "he-man, bad-boy" club membership revoked
I know what the theory is behind it (ummm.so to speak, sorry) but I can think of many otherahemmore "exciting" ways to do the "dirty." (I'm really sorry - I can't get away from these double-entenders
)
I dunno - it just seems a little too dirty (if there is such a thing). Maybe that's the appeal
Butt, (sorry) thanks for being a good sport about it!
"I am Jack's complete lack of surprise." -
MikeF-6 — 23 years ago(March 11, 2003 05:22 PM)
I am a fan of classic porn, that is, from about 1970 to 1985. Since that time there have been two major developments that have continued to grow until they are totally pervasive to the point where new Adult movies have become totally unwatchable for me. Those two things are artificially inflated tits and anal intercourse. Anal has always had a small role in if I may indulge in an oxymoron mainstream pornography. If a movie had one scene of anal, I could avert my eyes or fast forward. But today, virtually every sex scene includes it, usually just preceding the money shot. And how much bad can I say about a set of huge, solid, unmoving, siliconed or salined inflaties. Horrible. Oh, for an Annette Haven, an Abigail Clayton, a Nikki Charm, an Amber Hunt, a Renee Bond, a Dorothy LeMay, or, if you like them well-endowed, Kay Parker, Brooke West, or Lisa De Leeuw.
As for minor irritations that span the decades, whats up with all these women having sex with their shoes on?
mf -
Hermit C-2 — 23 years ago(March 17, 2003 04:35 AM)
Ok, I concede some points. I like natural breasts the best too, and some tit jobs are not very good. And you can OD on anal sex, especially in the "anal decade" of the 1990's and beyond.
But c'mon! Saying you don't like big (augmented) boobs and don't like anal sex is like saying you don't like porn as far as I'm concerned! It's like saying you like rock & roll but don't like the Beatles and the Rolling Stones! -
ajji-2 — 23 years ago(April 05, 2003 01:44 PM)
a woman's belly, ass, boobs, or anywhere other than her mouth/lips. of course, i'd prefer 'em to shoot off inside her (front or back), but that seems to have long gone out of fashion
i also don't much care for the obligatory lez scene in most contemporary films, unless the girls are joined by a man (or 2) later on.
and ABSOLUTELY no S&M/Bondage/Fetish/other weird sh*t for me. anal is about as 'kinky' as i like it.
"jeezwhat kinda childhood did
you
have?"
"short" -
CULTEGUY — 22 years ago(April 27, 2003 02:13 PM)
Do you mean at the beginning when they have that old Seventies porn actress give a little speech. Actually, I think in that case it's just the opposite. I mean, when I first read your post I thought you'd seen some odd scene involving the flag. What they have at the beginning of porn tapes, in regards to Freedom of Speeck was done so as a result of some legal battles the industry had (mostly brought on by feminists who claimed falsly that women were being forced into sex,) as well as some safe sex issues.
William E Stewart -
RoboSlater — 22 years ago(May 05, 2003 01:11 AM)
- Fake breasts
- Surgical scars on tummies of actresses
- The knowledge that 40% of the actors/actresses have a disease (normally chlamydia).
- Camera shots of the male actor's facial reactions
- Two actresses transferring white substance between them
- Dwarves
- Surgical scars under breasts
- "Silicone stretch" marks on boobs when they're hanging towards the floor.
- Underlighting
- Bad editing. Driving to a destination (5 minutes), parking the car and getting out (1 minute), walking to the place where sex will occur (3 minutes).
- Stretching an actual two-minute sex scene into a thirty-minute one by editing the sex scene so it plays over and over again and again, as if it was one continuous long sex romp. This is the worse.