Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

Film Glance Forum

  1. Home
  2. The Cinema
  3. Gangster films: The Death of a Genre

Gangster films: The Death of a Genre

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Cinema
3 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Offline
    F Offline
    fgadmin
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Film Noir


    jgcole — 9 years ago(January 08, 2017 04:07 PM)

    From today's
    guardian
    , an article about, and review of
    Live By Night
    , the new film by Ben Affleck. Here's a link to the article:
    https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/jan/08/live-by-night-ben-affleck-gangster-movie-death
    The reviewer pans the movie as well as the classic American gangster film and hopes that this film proves to be the "death knell" of the genre.
    Affleck clearly hopes to provide not mere entertainment, but a critique of US capitalism and in so doing illuminates the essential hypocrisy of the gangster genre. He wants to be the bad guy and the good guy at the same time.
    I think that gangster films have always differentiated between the gangster as the central character in the story and the gangster as some kind of a "good guy." To do otherwise would be to undermine the allure and appeal of the gangster. Above all else he's not a good guy; he's a ruthless killer, has no respect for law and law abiding citizens, and treats women badly. He's not Robin Hood. I really don't see the hypocrisy, essential or otherwise, that the author thinks is inherent in the genre.
    The gangster now stands way below the superhero in modern movie myth-making.
    That's for sure. Today's movie going demographic barely remembers
    The Sopranos
    and think that Pacino, DeNiro and Scorcese are well beyond the point of being relevant. I'm not a Ben Affleck fan and wonder if he has he fallen into the same hole that stars who direct themselves (I'm looking at you, Clint Eastwood) fall: it's not enough to just be the central character, they have to have transcendent qualities that transform them into mythic characters.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • F Offline
      F Offline
      fgadmin
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      XhcnoirX — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 04:56 AM)

      As one of the comments to the article says:
      If the writer was trying to put me off watching this, they didn't do a very good job.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F Offline
        F Offline
        fgadmin
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Manton29 — 9 years ago(February 03, 2017 11:53 PM)

        The death of the gangster film means the death of the anti-hero and he don't die, except when he's censored away and then he ain't really dead, he's just lying low.
        If to stand pat means to resist evil then, yes, neighbour, we wish to stand pat.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0

        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • Users
        • Groups